Josh Berkus wrote: > On 3/22/10 7:46 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I do not require them to submit SGML; just some format where I can > > identify the lines that changed. I can do the same for the release > > notes. I have to check the diffs anyway so manually merging in the > > changes isn't a problem. > > So there are 2 large problems I have with the SGML version, let's see if > we can deal with them separately: > > (1) re-arranging and regrouping the items: the stuff in the release > notes should end up in 7-8 clear categories, with items arranged in > descending order by importance. SGML+CVS makes this a task which cannot > be done collaboratively.
Uh, are you saying you want to remove the exiting release note subcategories and put everything into 7-8 long lists? That hardly seems like an improvement, or are you talking about make a user-focused list that is shorter with 7-8 categories? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
