Re: [HACKERS] release slippage

2011-06-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: > > One other problem I'm realizing: didn't Peter ask Bruce to revert the > > change to make pg_upgrade ignore case differences in locale names, on > > the grounds that it was not safe? > > There was a hypothesis that it wasn't safe, but no very clear evidenc

Re: [HACKERS] release slippage

2011-06-09 Thread Kevin Grittner
Robert Haas wrote: > Kevin Grittner wrote: >> There is this pending patch, without which there are infrequent >> conditions under which the users could get a LOG level message >> and accumulate files in pg_serial: >> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4dee7be402250003e...@gw.wicour

Re: [HACKERS] release slippage

2011-06-09 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > One other problem I'm realizing: didn't Peter ask Bruce to revert the > change to make pg_upgrade ignore case differences in locale names, on > the grounds that it was not safe? There was a hypothesis that it wasn't safe, but no very clear evidence either way. And we did ha

Re: [HACKERS] release slippage

2011-06-09 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 09.06.2011 17:46, Tom Lane wrote: "Kevin Grittner" writes: The other pending patch relates to the false positives serialization failures and funny-looking pg_lock entries from not ignoring non-MVCC snapshots in SSI. I don't think Dan had any problem with the patch I offered, but I wasn't su

Re: [HACKERS] release slippage

2011-06-09 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > There is this pending patch, without which there are infrequent > conditions under which the users could get a LOG level message and > accumulate files in pg_serial: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4dee7be402250003e...@gw.w

Re: [HACKERS] release slippage

2011-06-09 Thread Tom Lane
"Kevin Grittner" writes: > The other pending patch relates to the false positives serialization > failures and funny-looking pg_lock entries from not ignoring > non-MVCC snapshots in SSI. I don't think Dan had any problem with > the patch I offered, but I wasn't sure what to do about two > functi

Re: [HACKERS] release slippage

2011-06-09 Thread Kevin Grittner
Robert Haas wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > aren't we supposed to wrap beta2 any minute now? > > There are two open items listed on the open items page as blockers > for beta2: > > - error in information_schema.element_types view definition (bug > 5926) > - more SSI loose ends > > We really oug

Re: [HACKERS] release slippage

2011-06-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 16:27, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> So, speaking of that, aren't we supposed to wrap beta2 any minute now? > > Yes.  I'm expecting to do it this evening. > >> There are two open items listed on the open items page as blockers for beta2: > >> - error in informati

Re: [HACKERS] release slippage

2011-06-09 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > So, speaking of that, aren't we supposed to wrap beta2 any minute now? Yes. I'm expecting to do it this evening. > There are two open items listed on the open items page as blockers for beta2: > - error in information_schema.element_types view definition (bug 5926) > - mo

[HACKERS] release slippage

2011-06-09 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas writes: >> It's awfully late in the release cycle, but how about we add another >> digit to the filenames used by SLRU, to up the limit? > > It's way too late for that kind of thing, unless you are saying that SSI > in and of i