On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> First of all Thank you very much for running a wonderful Commit Fest.
Yes. Thanks, Josh.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@po
On Saturday, August 03, 2013 5:17 AM Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The first CF for the 9.4 development cycle is officially over.
>
> In all, 49 patches were committed, 47 were returned with feedback, 6
> were rejected outright, and 6 were punted to CF2. We're 17 days over
> the CF deadline at
(2013/08/03 8:47), Josh Berkus wrote:
Given that we can expect to be dealing with more patches per CF in the
future, I'd like some feedback about what things would make the CF
process more efficient. For that matter, for the first time we tried
enforcing some of the "rules" of CFs this time, and
On 08/02/2013 04:47 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The first CF for the 9.4 development cycle is officially over.
Also, I wanted to say "thank you" to:
- Mike Blackwell, assistant CFM
- all 30+ reviewers and committers (list to come)
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
h
Folks,
The first CF for the 9.4 development cycle is officially over.
In all, 49 patches were committed, 47 were returned with feedback, 6
were rejected outright, and 6 were punted to CF2. We're 17 days over
the CF deadline at this point, but that's unsurprising considering that
this CF included
