On Saturday, August 03, 2013 5:17 AM Josh Berkus wrote: > Folks, > > The first CF for the 9.4 development cycle is officially over. > > In all, 49 patches were committed, 47 were returned with feedback, 6 > were rejected outright, and 6 were punted to CF2. We're 17 days over > the CF deadline at this point, but that's unsurprising considering that > this CF included a record number of patches -- 108 patches at peak, > compared with 59 for last year's CF1, and 101 for even CF4. So this > was, measured strictly by patch count, the biggest CF ever (of course, > that's not the only measure). > > See my blog at > http://www.databasesoup.com/2013/08/94-commitfest-1-wrap-up.html for > some additional details. > > Given that we can expect to be dealing with more patches per CF in the > future, I'd like some feedback about what things would make the CF > process more efficient. For that matter, for the first time we tried > enforcing some of the "rules" of CFs this time, and I'd like to hear if > people think that helped.
First of all Thank you very much for running a wonderful Commit Fest. The best part according to me is that all patches got fair review comments/suggestions to improve. With Regards, Amit Kapila. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
