Folks, The first CF for the 9.4 development cycle is officially over.
In all, 49 patches were committed, 47 were returned with feedback, 6 were rejected outright, and 6 were punted to CF2. We're 17 days over the CF deadline at this point, but that's unsurprising considering that this CF included a record number of patches -- 108 patches at peak, compared with 59 for last year's CF1, and 101 for even CF4. So this was, measured strictly by patch count, the biggest CF ever (of course, that's not the only measure). See my blog at http://www.databasesoup.com/2013/08/94-commitfest-1-wrap-up.html for some additional details. Given that we can expect to be dealing with more patches per CF in the future, I'd like some feedback about what things would make the CF process more efficient. For that matter, for the first time we tried enforcing some of the "rules" of CFs this time, and I'd like to hear if people think that helped. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
