Tom Lane escreveu:
> I tend to agree with this opinion. That benchmark is obsolete to the
> point of having zero connection to the modern world; which is why we
> keep not noticing when it's busted. Anyone want to argue for keeping it
> in our sources?
>
+1 for removing it.
--
Euler Taveira
On Friday 14 August 2009 21:57:37 Tom Lane wrote:
> I observe that the following stuff is still being left behind after
> "make distclean" in doc/src/sgml/:
>
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 tgl tgl 934349 Aug 14 14:27 HISTORY.html
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 tgl tgl 727464 Aug 14 14:27 HISTORY
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 tgl tgl 337
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 14:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I tend to agree with Josh that you do need to offer two knobs. But
> expressing the second knob as a fraction (with range 0 to 1) might be
> better than an independent "min" parameter. As you say, that'd be
> useful to prevent people from setti
Stef Walter writes:
> True. I could build compatibility getifaddrs for various systems, if the
> community thought this patch was worth it, and would otherwise accept
> the patch.
If you can do that I think it'd remove the major objection.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander writes:
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 00:50, Stef Walter wrote:
>>> It would be great if, in the cidr-address field of pg_hba.conf, we could
>>> specify "samehost" and "samenet".
>
>> Seems like a reasonable feature - especially the samehost part.
>
> ISTM people h
Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> A couple of comments on the patch:
Thanks I'll keep these in mind, as things progress and for future patches.
> * In general, don't include configure in the patch. Just configure.in.
> Makes it easier to read, and configure is normally built by the
> committer anyway.
Michael Meskes írta:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 06:12:43PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>
>> - sqlda support:
>> - sqlda.c now indicates license
>> - #defines inside #if 0 ... #endif are now omitted from sqltypes.h
>> (both per comments from Jaime Casanova)
>>
>
> I still owe you s
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 06:12:43PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> - sqlda support:
> - sqlda.c now indicates license
> - #defines inside #if 0 ... #endif are now omitted from sqltypes.h
> (both per comments from Jaime Casanova)
I still owe you some first thoughts about this part of the p
Michael Meskes írta:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 01:02:07PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>
>> Here are the two test files, with their preprocessed C output.
>> Indeed, Informix emits a function call for DECLARE CURSOR.
>> And it seems it's not legal to do this outside of a function.
>>
>
I observe that the following stuff is still being left behind after
"make distclean" in doc/src/sgml/:
-rw-rw-r--. 1 tgl tgl 934349 Aug 14 14:27 HISTORY.html
-rw-rw-r--. 1 tgl tgl 727464 Aug 14 14:27 HISTORY
-rw-rw-r--. 1 tgl tgl 33746176 Aug 14 14:33 postgres-US.tex-pdf
-rw-rw-r--. 1 tgl tgl
Jeff Janes writes:
> The Wisconsin Benchmark in src/test/bench is broken, probably since 8.2.
Again? :-(
> Attached is a tested patch that fixes it. However, it might be better
> to just remove src/test/bench.
I tend to agree with this opinion. That benchmark is obsolete to the
point of havi
Jeff Davis writes:
> Yes. There are two ways to do the threshold:
> 1. Constant fraction of vacuum_freeze_min_age
> 2. Extra GUC
> I lean toward #1, because it avoids an extra GUC*, and it avoids the
> awkwardness when the "lower" setting is higher than the "higher"
> setting.
I tend to agre
Teodor Sigaev escribió:
> >so I think this is also ready to commit once the doc issues are
> >addressed.
>
> Oleg fixed that.
I think this is good ... as far as I'm concerned you can commit it if
you think it's OK. Please make sure you add $PostgreSQL$ tags to all
files (at least unaccent.c is m
Sorry, I screwed up. The below was supposed to go to the list, not
Tom personally.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jeff Janes
Date: Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TODO: fix priority of ordering of read and
write light-weight locks
To: Tom Lane
On Tue, Aug 1
> problem is that PostgreSQL uses ossp UUID which is not integrated in
> OpenSolaris. Solaris has own uuid implementation which seems to me similar
> but not same. Try man uuid_generate or less /usr/uuid/uuid.h
>
That's really interesting. I'll try this.
> It should be easy to port it but it need
Hi,
> I'd like to inform you about the issue of using psql in a dos batch file on
> windows vista.
>
> On linux all is very simple, you can easily write in your script
>
> psql -d mydb -U myuser -f myqry.sql < passw.txt
>
> On windows however, psql does not seem to work like this, nor does
>
> t
Hi guys,
I'd like to inform you about the issue of using psql in a dos batch file
on windows vista.
On linux all is very simple, you can easily write in your script
psql -d mydb -U myuser -f myqry.sql < passw.txt
On windows however, psql does not seem to work like this, nor does
type passwd
Magnus Hagander writes:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 00:50, Stef Walter wrote:
>> It would be great if, in the cidr-address field of pg_hba.conf, we could
>> specify "samehost" and "samenet".
> Seems like a reasonable feature - especially the samehost part.
ISTM people have traditionally used 127.0
so I think this is also ready to commit once the doc issues are
addressed.
Oleg fixed that.
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teo...@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
unaccent-0.7.gz
Description: Unix tar archive
Dne 24.07.09 19:23, Emanuel Calvo Franco napsal(a):
Hi all,
I have some issues to compile uuid contrib of 8.4 version.
Touching something i see that the gmake don't find uuid.h.
(pfexec gmake -d)
Touching more, i add uuid.h into the uuid directory and i had a
error message: missing separator.
Paul Matthews writes:
> The problem is, according to EXPLAIN, it still wants to do a sequential
> scan and not use the index. Any pointers as to why?
Can you force it with enable_seqscan = off? If so, then positionsel
isn't estimating a small enough number of matches to make an indexscan
look us
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:27:54PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> (2) ECPG dynamic cursor, SQLDA support. I think we're still waiting
>> on Michael Meskes to review this one.
>
> No. The first part of the patch needs some work and Zoltan is al
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 01:02:07PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> Here are the two test files, with their preprocessed C output.
> Indeed, Informix emits a function call for DECLARE CURSOR.
> And it seems it's not legal to do this outside of a function.
Okay, thanks. I changed several things i
Michael Meskes írta:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:55:53PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>
>> Okay, so it's a declarative command. But if we're in a function,
>> we should still emit a call to ecpg_init, to be able to follow
>>
>
> No, either it is declarative or it is not, but I don't se
Thanks, Bruce !
Oleg
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Thursday 13 August 2009 18:07:51 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
Peter,
how to write accented characters in sgml ? Is't not allowed to write
them as is ?
á for ?, etc. You can't use chara
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 00:50, Stef Walter wrote:
> I love using postgresql, and have for a long time. I'm involved with
> almost a hundred postgresql installs. But this is the first time I've
> gotten into the code.
>
> Renumbering networks happens often, and will happen more frequently as
> IPv4
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:55:53PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> Okay, so it's a declarative command. But if we're in a function,
> we should still emit a call to ecpg_init, to be able to follow
No, either it is declarative or it is not, but I don't see a reason for
different behaviour depend
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:27:54PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> (2) ECPG dynamic cursor, SQLDA support. I think we're still waiting
> on Michael Meskes to review this one.
No. The first part of the patch needs some work and Zoltan is already working
on it.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> In fact, by using 2PC without a recovery system you
> can end up with a transaction that's prepared but never committed or
> aborted, requiring an admin to remove it manually, which is even worse than
> not using 2PC to begin with.
Yes, true. But I think "hard-to-use
29 matches
Mail list logo
