Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > In fact, by using 2PC without a recovery system you > can end up with a transaction that's prepared but never committed or > aborted, requiring an admin to remove it manually, which is even worse than > not using 2PC to begin with.
Yes, true. But I think "hard-to-use" is better than "unable-to-do". If needed, we can develop some recovery systems working with the dblink together, no? Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
