Hi Horiguchi-san,
On 2021/06/09 11:47, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
On 2021/06/08 18:19, Tatsuro Yamada wrote:
I've tried your patch. Unfortunately, it didn't seem to have any good
effect on the script I sent to reproduce the problem.
Oops! The patch forgot about history files.
I checked the att
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 03:21:36PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 2:44 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> > ... or we could shorten those file names. I recall an episode
> > awhile ago where somebody complained that their version of "tar"
> > couldn't handle some of the path names in our t
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 10:41 PM Bharath Rupireddy
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 11:43 AM Peter Smith wrote:
> > Yes, it looks better, but (since the masks are all 1 bit) I was only
> > asking why not do like:
> >
> > if (supported_opts & SUBOPT_CONNECT)
> > if (supported_opts & SUBOPT_ENABLED
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 05:33:31PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> New version attached, with the detoasting code removed. Could use
> another round of validation/cleanup in case I missed something during
> the merge.
This looks rather sane to me, thanks.
/* Create the transient table that will re
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 12:44:42PM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> I confirm that the bug still exists in master (be57f216). The patch
> fixes it and looks good to me. I changed the wording a little and
> added a regression test. The updated patch is in the attachment. I
> added this thread to
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 5:16 PM Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
> Based on the off list discussion, I have modified the test based on
> the idea showed in
> "isolation/specs/insert-conflict-specconflict.spec", other open point
> we had about the race condition that how to ensure that when we unlock
> any sess
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:34 AM Ajin Cherian wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 4:19 PM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> > > 3.
> > > @@ -432,10 +432,19 @@ CreateInitDecodingContext(const char *plugin,
> > > MemoryContextSwitchTo(old_context);
> > >
> > > /*
> > > - * We allow decoding of prepared trans
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:58 AM Greg Nancarrow wrote:
>
> (5) src/backend/access/transam/twophase.c
>
> Question:
>
> Is:
>
> + * do this optimization if we encounter many collisions in GID
>
> meant to be:
>
> + * do this optimization if we encounter any collisions in GID
>
No, it should be fine
Bharath Rupireddy writes:
>> I've added a simple regression test to postgres_fdw, testing that batch
>> sizes > 65535 work fine, and pushed the fix.
> I was earlier thinking of adding one, but stopped because it might
> increase the regression test execution time. It looks like that's true
> - wi
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:37 AM Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
>
> On 6/9/21 5:33 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:06 AM Jeremy Schneider
> > wrote:
> >> On 6/4/21 23:42, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2021-Jun-04, Jeremy Schneider wrote:
> >>
> >> ERROR: XX000: could not open rel
On Tuesday, June 8, 2021 10:51 PM Robert Haas
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 11:33 PM Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> > Note the error is raised after applying the patch, without the patch,
> > the above won't show any error (error message could be improved here).
> > Such cases can lead to unpredictable behavi
I wrote:
> Bharath Rupireddy writes:
>>> I've added a simple regression test to postgres_fdw, testing that batch
>>> sizes > 65535 work fine, and pushed the fix.
>> I was earlier thinking of adding one, but stopped because it might
>> increase the regression test execution time. It looks like tha
On Wednesday, June 9, 2021 12:06 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 6:24 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the updated patch.
> >
> > I have few comments:
> > 1) Should we list the actual system tables like pg_class,pg_trigger,
> > etc instead of any other catalog table?
> > User
"houzj.f...@fujitsu.com" writes:
> On Tuesday, June 8, 2021 10:51 PM Robert Haas
> wrote:
>> In my opinion, you're basically taking too pure a view of this. We're
>> not trying to create a system that does such a good job checking
>> parallel safety markings that nobody can possibly find a thing
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 2:07 AM Robert Haas wrote:
> Then I tried to get things working on 9.6. There's a patch attached to
> back-port a couple of PostgresNode.pm methods from 10 to 9.6, and also
> a version of the main patch attached with the necessary wal->xlog,
> lsn->location renaming. Unfort
Hi
Thank you for fixing the patch.
The new patch works well in my environment. :-D
This may not be important at this time since it is a
PoC patch, but I would like to inform you that there
was a line that contained multiple spaces instead of tabs.
$ git diff --check
src/backend/access/transam
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo