On 2020-06-09 16:11, Tom Lane wrote:
Vik Fearing writes:
On 6/9/20 1:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
During the discussion in [0] I noticed that the extract()/date_part()
variants for time, timetz, and interval had virtually no test coverage.
So I put some more tests together, which should be u
Vik Fearing writes:
> On 6/9/20 1:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> During the discussion in [0] I noticed that the extract()/date_part()
>> variants for time, timetz, and interval had virtually no test coverage.
>> So I put some more tests together, which should be useful if we decide
>> to make
On 6/9/20 1:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> During the discussion in [0] I noticed that the extract()/date_part()
> variants for time, timetz, and interval had virtually no test coverage.
> So I put some more tests together, which should be useful if we decide
> to make any changes in this area pe
During the discussion in [0] I noticed that the extract()/date_part()
variants for time, timetz, and interval had virtually no test coverage.
So I put some more tests together, which should be useful if we decide
to make any changes in this area per [0].
[0]:
https://www.postgresql.org/messa
