Vik Fearing <v...@postgresfriends.org> writes:
> On 6/9/20 1:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> During the discussion in [0] I noticed that the extract()/date_part()
>> variants for time, timetz, and interval had virtually no test coverage.
>> So I put some more tests together, which should be useful if we decide
>> to make any changes in this area per [0].
> These look straightforward to me.
+1 here as well.
> Looking at that big table, I see everything is 0-based except the
> quarter. That seems unfortunate, and if this were a new feature I'd
> lobby to have it changed. I don't think we can do anything about it
> now, though.
Yeah, that ship has sailed :-(
regards, tom lane
