On 6/9/20 1:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > During the discussion in [0] I noticed that the extract()/date_part() > variants for time, timetz, and interval had virtually no test coverage. > So I put some more tests together, which should be useful if we decide > to make any changes in this area per [0].
These look straightforward to me. Looking at that big table, I see everything is 0-based except the quarter. That seems unfortunate, and if this were a new feature I'd lobby to have it changed. I don't think we can do anything about it now, though. -- Vik Fearing
