> On 4 May 2022, at 02:34, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I think we should make the standard MSVC install look as much like the
> standard Unix/msys install as possible.
+1
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
> On 3 May 2022, at 16:50, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>> On 3 May 2022, at 15:58, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>> On 2022-May-03, Noah Misch wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Paquier recommended s/-/_/ for uri-regress, and I agree with that.
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> libpq_uri-regress is horrible, so +1 f
On 2022-05-01 Su 09:23, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 01:07:06AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
>> My annual audit for executables missing Windows icons turned up these:
>>
>> pginstall/bin/testclient.exe
>> pginstall/bin/uri-regress.exe
>>
>> I was going to add the i
> On 3 May 2022, at 15:58, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2022-May-03, Noah Misch wrote:
>
>> Michael Paquier recommended s/-/_/ for uri-regress, and I agree with that.
>> What do you think?
>
> libpq_uri-regress is horrible, so +1 for that.
Agreed, I'll do that before pushing.
--
Daniel Gustaf
On 2022-May-03, Noah Misch wrote:
> Michael Paquier recommended s/-/_/ for uri-regress, and I agree with that.
> What do you think?
libpq_uri-regress is horrible, so +1 for that. I would personally
rename more thoroughly (say pq_uri_test), but I doubt it's worth the
bikeshedding effort.
--
Álv
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 03:04:26PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 3 May 2022, at 04:02, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 03:14:50PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> >> Renaming is probably the best option given how MSVC works. Using a pg_
> >> prefix
> >> makes them sound
> On 3 May 2022, at 04:02, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 03:14:50PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Renaming is probably the best option given how MSVC works. Using a pg_ prefix
>> makes them sound like actual useful tools though with (albeit small) risk for
>> confusion? Noah's
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 03:14:50PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 1 May 2022, at 15:23, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 01:07:06AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> >> My annual audit for executables missing Windows icons turned up these:
> >>
> >>pginstall/bin/testcli
On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 15:14 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Using a pg_ prefix
> makes them sound like actual useful tools though with (albeit small) risk for
> confusion? Noah's suggestion of libpq_ is perhaps better: libpq_testclient.
+1
I also like Justin's idea of only installing the test
> On 1 May 2022, at 15:23, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 01:07:06AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
>> My annual audit for executables missing Windows icons turned up these:
>>
>>pginstall/bin/testclient.exe
>>pginstall/bin/uri-regress.exe
>>
>> I was going to add
On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 10:23:18PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 01:07:06AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > My annual audit for executables missing Windows icons turned up these:
> >
> > pginstall/bin/testclient.exe
> > pginstall/bin/uri-regress.exe
> >
> >
On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 01:07:06AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> My annual audit for executables missing Windows icons turned up these:
>
> pginstall/bin/testclient.exe
> pginstall/bin/uri-regress.exe
>
> I was going to add the icons, but I felt the testclient.exe name is too
> gener
12 matches
Mail list logo
