On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 15:14 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > Using a pg_ prefix > makes them sound like actual useful tools though with (albeit small) risk for > confusion? Noah's suggestion of libpq_ is perhaps better: libpq_testclient.
+1 I also like Justin's idea of only installing the test executables when asked to explicitly, but I don't know enough about our existing MSVC conventions to have a strong opinion there. Thanks, --Jacob
