On 8/18/20 9:22 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This thread started on committers, at
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200818234532.uiafo5br5lo6zhya%40alap3.anarazel.de
>
> In it I wanted to add a isolation test around prepared transactions:
>
> On 2020-08-18 16:45:32 -0700, Andres Fr
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 07:34:00PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> It seems like the buildfarm ought to configure the started server with a
> bunch of prepared transactions, in that case? At least going forward?
Agreed. Testing with max_prepared_transactions > 0 has much more
value than not, for su
Hi,
On 2020-08-18 22:24:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > ISTM we should just add an alternative output for disabled prepared
> > xacts, and re-add the test?
>
> I believe the buildfarm runs the isolation step with "make installcheck",
> so if you're hoping to get buildfarm c
Andres Freund writes:
> ISTM we should just add an alternative output for disabled prepared
> xacts, and re-add the test?
I believe the buildfarm runs the isolation step with "make installcheck",
so if you're hoping to get buildfarm coverage that way, you're mistaken.
Having said that, it'd prob
