Hi, On 2020-08-18 22:24:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > ISTM we should just add an alternative output for disabled prepared > > xacts, and re-add the test? > > I believe the buildfarm runs the isolation step with "make installcheck", > so if you're hoping to get buildfarm coverage that way, you're mistaken.
It seems like the buildfarm ought to configure the started server with a bunch of prepared transactions, in that case? At least going forward? > Having said that, it'd probably be good if "make check" did run this test. Yea. It'd at least be run when we do check-world - which at least I do before nearly every commit. Greetings, Andres Freund
