Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > ISTM we should just add an alternative output for disabled prepared > xacts, and re-add the test?
I believe the buildfarm runs the isolation step with "make installcheck",
so if you're hoping to get buildfarm coverage that way, you're mistaken.
Having said that, it'd probably be good if "make check" did run this test.
regards, tom lane
