On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:03:11AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Not sure that's worth the trouble. If there are no objections, I will
> remove the compatibility macros.
Okay, cleanup done with the compatibility macros removed.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:34:44PM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Would it be possible to wrap them in some #if(n)def guard so that
> they're available when building out-of-tree extensions, but not when
> building postgres itself?
Not sure that's worth the trouble. If there are no objec
Andres Freund writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-10-17 06:58:27 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2019-Oct-17, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 01:04:50AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> > > Wonder if it's worth removing the backward compat ones from master? I
>> > > don't quite thi
Hi,
On 2019-10-17 06:58:27 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Oct-17, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 01:04:50AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > Wonder if it's worth removing the backward compat ones from master? I
> > > don't quite think so, but...
> >
> > I would vot
On 2019-Oct-17, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 01:04:50AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Wonder if it's worth removing the backward compat ones from master? I
> > don't quite think so, but...
>
> I would vote for the removal so as we'll never see that again in
> core. Let's se
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 01:04:50AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Wonder if it's worth removing the backward compat ones from master? I
> don't quite think so, but...
I would vote for the removal so as we'll never see that again in
core. Let's see what others think here.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2019-10-17 10:47:06 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I have just bumped into $subject, and we now use the table_*
>> equivalents in the code. Any objections to the simple patch attached
>> to clean up that?
> They're not really "remaining", as much as having been intro
Hi,
On 2019-10-17 10:47:06 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I have just bumped into $subject, and we now use the table_*
> equivalents in the code. Any objections to the simple patch attached
> to clean up that?
They're not really "remaining", as much as having been introduced after
the introduct
