Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-10-17 10:47:06 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I have just bumped into $subject, and we now use the table_*
>> equivalents in the code. Any objections to the simple patch attached
>> to clean up that?
> They're not really "remaining", as much as having been introduced after
> the introduction of table_open()/close()...
> Wonder if it's worth removing the backward compat ones from master? I
> don't quite think so, but...
If we don't remove 'em, we'll keep getting new calls from patches that
haven't been updated.
regards, tom lane
