Hi, On 2019-10-17 10:47:06 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > I have just bumped into $subject, and we now use the table_* > equivalents in the code. Any objections to the simple patch attached > to clean up that?
They're not really "remaining", as much as having been introduced after the introduction of table_open()/close()... Wonder if it's worth removing the backward compat ones from master? I don't quite think so, but... Greetings, Andres Freund
