On 1/12/18 20:51, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
In perspective, this mechanism provides the low-level instrument to
define remote procedure call on extension side. The simple RPC that
defines effective userid on remote backend (remote_effective_user
function) is attached for example.
7) Suppose, API all
Hi Maksim,
On 3/5/18 11:24 AM, Maksim Milyutin wrote:
> Hello David,
>
>
> On 05.03.2018 18:50, David Steele wrote:
>> Hello Maksim,
>>
>> On 1/27/18 2:19 PM, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
>>
>>> Is there actual need in UnregisterCustomProcSignal() within _PG_init()?
>>> An extension registers a handler
Hello David,
On 05.03.2018 18:50, David Steele wrote:
Hello Maksim,
On 1/27/18 2:19 PM, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
Is there actual need in UnregisterCustomProcSignal() within _PG_init()?
An extension registers a handler and then unregister it doing
nothing. It seems useless.
Also process_shared_
Hello Maksim,
On 1/27/18 2:19 PM, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 02:34:58PM +0300, Maksim Milyutin wrote:
>
> The patch is applied and build.
>
>> +/*
>> + * UnregisterCustomProcSignal
>> + * Release slot of specific custom signal.
>> + *
>> + * This function have to be cal
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 02:34:58PM +0300, Maksim Milyutin wrote:
> ...
> I have attached a new version of patch and updated version of
> remote_effective_user function implementation that demonstrates the usage of
> custom signals API.
Thank you.
The patch is applied and build.
> +/*
> +
Hello!
On 11.01.2018 18:53, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
The relationship between custom signals and
assigned handlers (function addresses) is replicated from postmaster to
child processes including working backends.
I think this happens only if a custom signal registered during initializing
shared_
On 12.01.2018 18:51, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
In perspective, this mechanism provides the low-level instrument to
define remote procedure call on extension side. The simple RPC that
defines effective userid on remote backend (remote_effective_user
function) is attached for example.
Suppose, it's
In perspective, this mechanism provides the low-level instrument to define
remote procedure call on extension side. The simple RPC that defines effective
userid on remote backend (remote_effective_user function) is attached for example.
Suppose, it's useful patch. Some notes:
1) AssignCustomPr
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 03:05:25PM +0300, Maksim Milyutin wrote:
> Hi, hackers!
>
>
> I want to propose the patch that allows to define custom signals and their
> handlers on extension side.
>
I've looked a little bit on the patch. The patch applyes and regression tests
pass.
I have a
