Hello,
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 02:34:58PM +0300, Maksim Milyutin wrote:
> ...
> I have attached a new version of patch and updated version of
> remote_effective_user function implementation that demonstrates the usage of
> custom signals API.
Thank you.
The patch is applied and build.
> +/*
> + * UnregisterCustomProcSignal
> + * Release slot of specific custom signal.
> + *
> + * This function have to be called in _PG_init or _PG_fini functions of
> + * extensions at the stage of loading shared preloaded libraries. Otherwise
> it
> + * throws fatal error. Also it throws fatal error if argument is not valid
> + * custom signal.
> + */
> +void
> +UnregisterCustomProcSignal(ProcSignalReason reason)
> +{
> + if (!process_shared_preload_libraries_in_progress)
> + ereport(FATAL, (errcode(ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR),
> + errmsg("cannot unregister
> custom signal after startup")));
Is there actual need in UnregisterCustomProcSignal() within _PG_init()?
An extension registers a handler and then unregister it doing
nothing. It seems useless.
Also process_shared_preload_libraries_in_progress within _PG_fini() will
be false I think. _PG_fini() won't be called though, because
implementation of internal_unload_library() is disabled.
Actually, is there need in UnregisterCustomProcSignal() at all? It
unregisters a handler only in current backend, for actual unergistering
we need to call it everywhere, if I'm not mistaken.
--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
