On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 10:46:30 +0200
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 02.07.18 10:38, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> >> On 29 Jun 2018, at 18:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >> +1 for shortening it as proposed by Peter. The existing arrangement
> >> made sense when it was first written, when there were only ab
On 02.07.18 10:38, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 29 Jun 2018, at 18:44, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> +1 for shortening it as proposed by Peter. The existing arrangement
>> made sense when it was first written, when there were only about three
>> individual options IIRC. Now it's just confusing, especi
> On 29 Jun 2018, at 18:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> +1 for shortening it as proposed by Peter. The existing arrangement
> made sense when it was first written, when there were only about three
> individual options IIRC. Now it's just confusing, especially since you
> can't tell very easily whether an
> On 29 Jun 2018, at 18:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> Now it's just confusing, especially since you
> can't tell very easily whether any of the individual options were
> intentionally omitted from the list. It will not get better with
> more options, either.
Agreed, that’s a good point.
cheers ./danie
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> On 29 Jun 2018, at 15:42, Peter Eisentraut
>> wrote:
>> While we're here, do people find this useful:
>>
>>
>> INCLUDING ALL is an abbreviated form of
>> INCLUDING COMMENTS INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS INCLUDING
>> DEFAULTS INCLUDING IDENTITY INCLUDING INDEXES INCLUDING S
> On 29 Jun 2018, at 15:42, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
>
> While we're here, do people find this useful:
>
>
> INCLUDING ALL is an abbreviated form of
> INCLUDING COMMENTS INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS INCLUDING
> DEFAULTS INCLUDING IDENTITY INCLUDING INDEXES INCLUDING STATISTICS
> INCLUD
While we're here, do people find this useful:
INCLUDING ALL is an abbreviated form of
INCLUDING COMMENTS INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS INCLUDING
DEFAULTS INCLUDING IDENTITY INCLUDING INDEXES INCLUDING STATISTICS
INCLUDING STORAGE.
Maybe something more like "... is an abbreviated f
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 11:36:19 +0200
Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 29 Jun 2018, at 09:14, Yugo Nagata wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot.
> >
> > I updated the patch.
>
> This version looks good to me. You might want to add it to the CF to make
> sure
> it isn’t forgotten.
>
> cheers ./daniel
Sure
> On 29 Jun 2018, at 09:14, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> Thanks a lot.
>
> I updated the patch.
This version looks good to me. You might want to add it to the CF to make sure
it isn’t forgotten.
cheers ./daniel
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 08:39:01 +0200
Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 29 Jun 2018, at 07:56, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:22:15 -0700
> > "David G. Johnston" wrote:
>
> >> Maybe try something like:
> >>
> >> It is legal to specify the same option multiple times - e.g., "INCLUDI
> On 29 Jun 2018, at 07:56, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:22:15 -0700
> "David G. Johnston" wrote:
>> Maybe try something like:
>>
>> It is legal to specify the same option multiple times - e.g., "INCLUDING
>> option EXCLUDING option" - the outcome is whichever comes last in the
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:22:15 -0700
"David G. Johnston" wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
Thank you for your reviewing!
I attached the updated patch.
>
> > > On 27 Jun 2018, at 18:02, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> >
> > > I found that there isn't explanation about EXC
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 27 Jun 2018, at 18:02, Yugo Nagata wrote:
>
> > I found that there isn't explanation about EXCLUDING in CREATE TABLE doc.
> > Attached is a patch to add this. I would appreciate it if a native
> English
> > speaker comments on this
> On 27 Jun 2018, at 18:02, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> I found that there isn't explanation about EXCLUDING in CREATE TABLE doc.
> Attached is a patch to add this. I would appreciate it if a native English
> speaker comments on this.
+ If EXCLUDING option is specified
The empty seems wrong.
+
Hi,
I found that there isn't explanation about EXCLUDING in CREATE TABLE doc.
Attached is a patch to add this. I would appreciate it if a native English
speaker comments on this.
Regards,
--
Yugo Nagata
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml
index
15 matches
Mail list logo