On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 06:18, David Fetter wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 04:22:18PM +0200, Rafia Sabih wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 14:49, Rafia Sabih wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 10:30, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello David,
> > > >
> > > > >>> I notice
Hello David,
Patch applies. There seems to be a compilation issue:
describe.c:5974:1: error: expected declaration or statement at end of
input
}
Also there is an added indentation problem: the size & description stuff
have been moved left but it should still in the verbose case, and a } i
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 09:19:57AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
> Patch v3 applies, but compiles for me with a warning because the indentation
> of the following size block has been changed:
>
> describe.c: In function ‘listTables’:
> describe.c:3705:7: warning: this ‘if’ claus
Hello David,
Patch v3 applies, but compiles for me with a warning because the
indentation of the following size block has been changed:
describe.c: In function ‘listTables’:
describe.c:3705:7: warning: this ‘if’ clause does not guard...
[-Wmisleading-indentation]
else if (pset.sversion >=
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 04:22:18PM +0200, Rafia Sabih wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 14:49, Rafia Sabih wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 10:30, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello David,
> > >
> > > >>> I noticed that there wasn't a bulk way to see table logged-ness in
> > > >>> p
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 14:49, Rafia Sabih wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 10:30, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello David,
> >
> > >>> I noticed that there wasn't a bulk way to see table logged-ness in psql,
> > >>> so I made it part of \dt+.
> > >>
> > >> Applies, compiles, works for me.
>
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 10:30, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
>
> Hello David,
>
> >>> I noticed that there wasn't a bulk way to see table logged-ness in psql,
> >>> so I made it part of \dt+.
> >>
> >> Applies, compiles, works for me.
> >>
> >> ISTM That temporary-ness is not shown either. Maybe the persi
Hello David,
I noticed that there wasn't a bulk way to see table logged-ness in psql,
so I made it part of \dt+.
Applies, compiles, works for me.
ISTM That temporary-ness is not shown either. Maybe the persistence column
should be shown as is?
Temporariness added, but not raw.
Ok, it is
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 07:03:58AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
> > I noticed that there wasn't a bulk way to see table logged-ness in psql,
> > so I made it part of \dt+.
>
> Applies, compiles, works for me.
>
> ISTM That temporary-ness is not shown either. Maybe the persiste
Hello David,
I noticed that there wasn't a bulk way to see table logged-ness in psql,
so I made it part of \dt+.
Applies, compiles, works for me.
ISTM That temporary-ness is not shown either. Maybe the persistence column
should be shown as is?
Also I'd suggest that the column should be d
>From 518efc003730c441663aae42c18d16f0908bd55d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Fetter
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 17:50:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v1] Show whether tables are logged in \dt+
To: hackers
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="2.20.1"
This is a mul
11 matches
Mail list logo
