On 1/12/18 20:51, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
In perspective, this mechanism provides the low-level instrument to
define remote procedure call on extension side. The simple RPC that
defines effective userid on remote backend (remote_effective_user
function) is attached for example.
7) Suppose, API all
Hi Maksim,
On 3/5/18 11:24 AM, Maksim Milyutin wrote:
> Hello David,
>
>
> On 05.03.2018 18:50, David Steele wrote:
>> Hello Maksim,
>>
>> On 1/27/18 2:19 PM, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
>>
>>> Is there actual need in UnregisterCustomProcSignal() within _PG_init()?
>>> An extension registers a handler
Hello David,
On 05.03.2018 18:50, David Steele wrote:
Hello Maksim,
On 1/27/18 2:19 PM, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
Is there actual need in UnregisterCustomProcSignal() within _PG_init()?
An extension registers a handler and then unregister it doing
nothing. It seems useless.
Also process_shared_
Hello Maksim,
On 1/27/18 2:19 PM, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 02:34:58PM +0300, Maksim Milyutin wrote:
>
> The patch is applied and build.
>
>> +/*
>> + * UnregisterCustomProcSignal
>> + * Release slot of specific custom signal.
>> + *
>> + * This function have to be cal
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 02:34:58PM +0300, Maksim Milyutin wrote:
> ...
> I have attached a new version of patch and updated version of
> remote_effective_user function implementation that demonstrates the usage of
> custom signals API.
Thank you.
The patch is applied and build.
> +/*
> +
Hello!
On 11.01.2018 18:53, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
The relationship between custom signals and
assigned handlers (function addresses) is replicated from postmaster to
child processes including working backends.
I think this happens only if a custom signal registered during initializing
shared_
On 12.01.2018 18:51, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
In perspective, this mechanism provides the low-level instrument to
define remote procedure call on extension side. The simple RPC that
defines effective userid on remote backend (remote_effective_user
function) is attached for example.
Suppose, it's
In perspective, this mechanism provides the low-level instrument to define
remote procedure call on extension side. The simple RPC that defines effective
userid on remote backend (remote_effective_user function) is attached for example.
Suppose, it's useful patch. Some notes:
1) AssignCustomPr
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 03:05:25PM +0300, Maksim Milyutin wrote:
> Hi, hackers!
>
>
> I want to propose the patch that allows to define custom signals and their
> handlers on extension side.
>
I've looked a little bit on the patch. The patch applyes and regression tests
pass.
I have a
Hi, hackers!
I want to propose the patch that allows to define custom signals and
their handlers on extension side. It is based on ProcSignal module,
namely it defines the fixed set (number is specified by constant) of
custom signals that could be reserved on postgres initialization stage
(i
10 matches
Mail list logo
