On 06/17/2016 04:33 PM, Gavin Flower wrote:
On 18/06/16 08:36, Andy Colson wrote:
Hi all.
I have access to quite a few laptop HD's (10 to 15 of them at least), and
thought that might make a neat test box that might have some good IO speed.
Needs to be cheap though, so linux with software raid
On 06/17/2016 09:23 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Andy Colson mailto:a...@squeakycode.net>> wrote:
Hi all.
I have access to quite a few laptop HD's (10 to 15 of them at least), and
thought that might make a neat test box that might have some good IO speed.
On 06/17/2016 04:39 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 6/17/2016 2:33 PM, John W Higgins wrote:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/2U-24-bay-2-5-Supermicro-Server-X8DTH-iF-2x-Xeon-Quad-Core-32GB-RAM-SAS2-216EL1-/222132081393?hash=item33b81a92f1:g:UzYAAOSwR5dXSQVw
With it being 2U you can then pop out the motherb
On 06/18/2016 11:52 AM, Andy Colson wrote:
On 06/17/2016 04:39 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 6/17/2016 2:33 PM, John W Higgins wrote:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/2U-24-bay-2-5-Supermicro-Server-X8DTH-iF-2x-Xeon-Quad-Core-32GB-RAM-SAS2-216EL1-/222132081393?hash=item33b81a92f1:g:UzYAAOSwR5dXSQVw
With
Agreed with Joshua, a single ssd will have way more performance than all 15
of those for random io for sure, and probably be very close on sequential.
That said, a raid controller able to handle all 15 drives (or multiple that
handle a subset of the drives) is likely to be more expensive than a sin
From: Adam Brusselback
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] OT hardware recommend
It's really amazing how much solid state drives transferred the database
bottleneck away from disk.
Adam – so very true. We used to spend ungodly amounts of time/money/effort to
m
