From: Adam Brusselback
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] OT hardware recommend

 

It's really amazing how much solid state drives transferred the database 
bottleneck away from disk.

 

 

Adam – so very true.  We used to spend ungodly amounts of time/money/effort to 
mitigate disk performance limitations.  It is almost MAGIC what SSDs do now.

 

Real numbers don’t lie: 5400 rpm disks can muster no more than 65 IOPS (7200s 
get ~90-100, 10k get 140-150).  So:

 

15 x 65 = 975 IOPS (aka boohoo)

 

Using the AS SSD Benchmark, the Samsung 480gb m2 850 EVO in my core i7 laptop 
measures (IOPS then MB/s):

Random 4k blocks:  7,235 iops read, 14,012 iops

Random 4K-64Threads:  97,743 iops read, 68,864 iops write

Random 512B:  14,380 iops read, 19,858 iops write (db comparison here)

MB/s:

Sequential: 500 MB/s read, 449 MB/s write

Random 4K:  28.26 MB/s read,  54.74 MB/s  write

4K-64Threads: 381.81 MB/s read, 269.00 MB/s write (this is closer to what db 
access looks like).

Access Times:  0.070 ms read, 0.050 ms write

 

Thusly,

1 x SSD = 14.75 times faster than a 15 drive array on reads, and 20 times 
faster on writes.

 

Like everyone else has said, just buy a 1 TB Samsung EVO 850 for $300 (USD) and 
call it a day.  :)

 

Mike

 

Reply via email to