At 07:50 PM 11/30/00 -0600, GH wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 07:58:29AM -0800, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
>> At 09:44 AM 11/21/00 -0700, Tim Uckun wrote:
>>
>> >What about the php module? Does it take advantage of API?
>>
>> I don't know. If not, though, there wouldn't be much point in u
At 09:44 AM 11/21/00 -0700, Tim Uckun wrote:
>What about the php module? Does it take advantage of API?
I don't know. If not, though, there wouldn't be much point in using
AOLserver, since the simple and efficient database API is the main
attraction. So I think there's a pretty good chance it
carl garland wrote:
>
> >perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went
> >significantly above 10/sec?
>
> I think alot of it has to do with the web server/db setup not pg. They are
> using Apache/PHP and looking at their code every page has the additional
> overhead of maki
At 09:27 AM 11/15/00 -0800, Tom Samplonius wrote:
> AOLServer isn't the only system that can pool database connections, so
>can servlets/JSP, ColdFusion, ASP, etc. No doubt AOLServer would be more
>widely accepted if it used something other than TCL.
There are two separate modules that support
At 01:53 PM 11/15/00 -0500, markw wrote:
>I'd rather not pollute the application's SQL with postgres-isms. Not that I
>don't love postgres, but there are always critics looking for a reason to use
>Oracle or (gasp) MS-SQL.
Define some global variable with the name of the database being run (curr
At 11:22 AM 11/13/00 -0500, Robert D. Nelson wrote:
>Still...Regardless of what database they're running, either their
>abstraction layer is shit or their queries really need optimized. Is that
>perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went
>significantly above 10/sec?
Th
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert D. Nelson
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 12:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Michael Fork; Poul L.Christiansen
> Cc: pgsql-general; pgsql-hackers
> Subject: [HACKERS] RE: [G
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
> What is the value for MinSpareServers in your apache's conf? If that's
> set to 20, then even if you only hit your site 20 times (one for each),
> that many apache processes will continue to live and therefore keep a db
> connection open..??
>
> Wh
> On Jue 16 Nov 2000 22:54, Marko Kreen wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 01:33:08PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > >
> > > I run PHP4 and IMP (http://www.horde.org) and we've gotten then to remove
> > > the useof pg_pconnect() since it is broken. Broken how, you might
> > > ask? Well, I r
On Jue 16 Nov 2000 22:54, Marko Kreen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 01:33:08PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> > I run PHP4 and IMP (http://www.horde.org) and we've gotten then to remove
> > the useof pg_pconnect() since it is broken. Broken how, you might
> > ask? Well, I ran on a stan
rom: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "carl garland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTE
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Adam Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
> Just a note, I've been using Postgres 7.02 and PHP 4.02
--- Original Message -
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "carl garland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PH
14 matches
Mail list logo
