Just a note, I've been using Postgres 7.02 and PHP 4.02 or 4.03 for about a 
month in a couple sites, and haven't experienced any problems with 
persistent connections.  Problem might have been fixed in one of the point 
releases, or maybe I just don't have enough different db connections to 
trigger it.


At 02:05 PM 11/15/00, Adam Lang wrote:
>PHP 4 was having problems with persistent connections (not sure if with just
>pgsql or all dbs).  Maybe that is why they didn't use it.
>
>Adam Lang
>Systems Engineer
>Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "carl garland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 12:28 PM
>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, carl garland wrote:
> >
> > # >perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went
> > # >significantly above 10/sec?
> > #
> > # I think alot of it has to do with the web server/db setup not pg.  They
>are
> > # using Apache/PHP and looking at their code every page has the additional
> > # overhead of making the db connection.  Now if they had used AOLserver
>with
> > # its persistent db connecction pooling scheme they may have faired better
>;)
> >
> > I haven't actually looked at their code they used to test with to
> > see if they are actually using it, but Apache/PHP has the ability to do
> > persistent db connections.  I would be surprised that someone like Tim (
> > who seems to have done a fair bit of php with db stuff) would not make use
> > of such a feature.
> >
> > If you can point out an example of where they are not using this
> > feature I will gladly stand corrected.
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > | Joseph Scott                       The Office Of Water Programs  |
> > | [EMAIL PROTECTED]          [EMAIL PROTECTED]     |
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to