On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 10:03:49AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Sam Mason writes:
> > Rotating the array by 180 degrees in every dimension would give the same
> > answer for 1-dimensional arrays and give sensible answers for higher
> > dimensional arrays.
>
> The easy implementation at the C level wo
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:55:20AM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Sam Mason wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:20:38AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Craig Ringer writes:
> >> > Before I go ahead and try to write a decent quality version: is there
> >> > any chance
Sam Mason writes:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:20:38AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What would it mean for a multi-dimensional array?
> Rotating the array by 180 degrees in every dimension would give the same
> answer for 1-dimensional arrays and give sensible answers for higher
> dimensional arrays
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Sam Mason wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:20:38AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Craig Ringer writes:
>> > Before I go ahead and try to write a decent quality version: is there
>> > any chance an array_reverse() function (in C) would be accepted into Pg
>> > mainlin
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:20:38AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer writes:
> > Before I go ahead and try to write a decent quality version: is there
> > any chance an array_reverse() function (in C) would be accepted into Pg
> > mainline?
>
> What would it mean for a multi-dimensional array
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer writes:
>> Before I go ahead and try to write a decent quality version: is there
>> any chance an array_reverse() function (in C) would be accepted into Pg
>> mainline?
>
> What would it mean for a multi-dimensional array?
Couple of
Craig Ringer writes:
> Before I go ahead and try to write a decent quality version: is there
> any chance an array_reverse() function (in C) would be accepted into Pg
> mainline?
What would it mean for a multi-dimensional array?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-gener
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Craig Ringer
wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> Before I go ahead and try to write a decent quality version: is there
> any chance an array_reverse() function (in C) would be accepted into Pg
> mainline? If not, I probably won't bother cleaning up my current
> awful-hack quality
Hi all
Before I go ahead and try to write a decent quality version: is there
any chance an array_reverse() function (in C) would be accepted into Pg
mainline? If not, I probably won't bother cleaning up my current
awful-hack quality module.
It's a slow operation to perform in SQL or PL/PgSQL even
