On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:20:38AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Craig Ringer <cr...@postnewspapers.com.au> writes: > > Before I go ahead and try to write a decent quality version: is there > > any chance an array_reverse() function (in C) would be accepted into Pg > > mainline? > > What would it mean for a multi-dimensional array?
Rotating the array by 180 degrees in every dimension would give the same answer for 1-dimensional arrays and give sensible answers for higher dimensional arrays. For example: 1,2,3 == 3,2,1 [1 2 3 [9 8 7 4 5 6 == 6 5 4 7 8 9] 3 2 1] I think higher dimensionality would work, it's just a bit fiddly to draw. -- Sam http://samason.me.uk/ -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
