On mån, 2009-12-14 at 16:58 +0100, Philippe Lang wrote:
> My idea was to parse the functions definitions in order to build
> dependencies between the functions. I'm not sure how difficult it is,
> especially with overloaded functions, which require more than a simple
> pattern search inside the fun
Tom wrote:
>> In order to have a "global map" of the dependencies of the functions,
>> views, tables in a PG database, I'd like to have some sort of
>> "dependency tracking tool"...
>>
>>
>>
>> Is it correct to say that this "hierarchy" does not exist inside
>> Postgresql, and that it is necessar
Philippe Lang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In order to have a "global map" of the dependencies of the functions,
> views, tables in a PG database, I'd like to have some sort of
> "dependency tracking tool", that would show for each object:
>
> - which other objects depend on this object
> - on which other
"Philippe Lang" writes:
> In order to have a "global map" of the dependencies of the functions,
> views, tables in a PG database, I'd like to have some sort of
> "dependency tracking tool", that would show for each object:
> - which other objects depend on this object
> - on which other objects t
Hello,
In order to have a "global map" of the dependencies of the functions,
views, tables in a PG database, I'd like to have some sort of
"dependency tracking tool", that would show for each object:
- which other objects depend on this object
- on which other objects this object depends
This wo
