On Thursday 03 June 2010 20.03:19 J. Bagg wrote:
> because I tend to skim
> over the PostgreSQL related ones, assuming they're connected with the
> ready-built version.
I'm just curious: why are you compiling your own?
If you want to stick with lenny and need 8.4: It's in backports.org (package
I'd like to propose the following items be added to the todo list:
(Any thoughts?)
1) Modify composite types to allow ALTER DOMAIN(s) to ADD CONSTRAINT.
2) Allow a since ALTER DOMAIN issue multiple ADD and DROP commands in
a single statement.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Richard Broersma
wro
On 4/06/2010 7:26 AM, Wang, Mary Y wrote:
I thought about DROP DATABASE, but wasn't sure if it would clean up EVERYTHING.
It won't remove your users and roles, or anything else that you see
reported in pg_dumpall --globals-only .
I assume most of you would just do the DROP DATABASE for the
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Smith [mailto:g...@2ndquadrant.com]
-snip-
>
> Gareth.Williams wrote:
> > So the rest of the question is, if I have two indexes with identical
> definitions, what happens? I've confirmed that I can create indexes with
> identical definitions (except name)
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 2:15 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> zhong ming wu wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> This machine is RHEL 5.5 and has both RH stock postgres 8.1.18 in
>
> you probably need to either use "-R $HOME/local/lib" on the link command to
> specify the runtime path to find .so's in, or add $HOME/local
I thought about DROP DATABASE, but wasn't sure if it would clean up EVERYTHING.
I had a bad experience early this year when I restored a database that was
running on Postgres 7.x.x. The database crashed badly, that I couldn't recover
it. It ended up that I had to restore it from a previous n
On Thursday 03 June 2010 4:05:14 pm Wang, Mary Y wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've some test data in a database and would like to delete that database
> and clean everything that is associated with that database. Then I'd like
> to populate the same database with different data. My plan is to:
> (1) Remove th
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 16:05 -0700, Wang, Mary Y wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've some test data in a database and would like to delete that database and
> clean everything that is associated with that database. Then I'd like to
> populate the same database with different data.
> My plan is to:
> (1) Remov
Hi,
I've some test data in a database and would like to delete that database and
clean everything that is associated with that database. Then I'd like to
populate the same database with different data.
My plan is to:
(1) Remove the /usr/local/pgsql/data directory
(2) psql -e mydatabase -f /tmp/
Arnold, Sandra osti.gov> writes:
>
> Is anyone using
> NeXpose Rapid 7 to scan your PostgreSQL databases for vulnerbilities? If
> so, what authentication are you using to allow it to connect to your
> database? Or, how are you configuring the software to allow it to connect
> to the databas
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> I'm interested in this too...does anyone else have experience in this matter?
>
I've pondered this many times. My questions are what failure mode are
you looking to avoid, especially if you're using pgbouncer for load
balance in addition to
Excerpts from Peter Geoghegan's message of jue jun 03 16:23:07 -0400 2010:
> >
> > \set VERBOSITY terse
> >
>
> Well, I actually didn't mean through psql, but I see I can set
> verbosity though a call to PQsetErrorVerbosity().
>
> Maybe this would work better as a GUC that can be set per session?
>
> \set VERBOSITY terse
>
Well, I actually didn't mean through psql, but I see I can set
verbosity though a call to PQsetErrorVerbosity().
Maybe this would work better as a GUC that can be set per session?
That way, we wouldn't have to worry about downstream driver authors
supporting it.
--
Re
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Mario Ignacio Rodríguez Cortés
wrote:
> hello all:
>
> Well, i have a question if you know about this, i have a webserver in a
> server and i have a database server, the question is: where should I
> install the pgbouncer? in webserver, in database server or is the
Hello
2010/6/3 Peter Geoghegan :
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to avoid seeing a CONTEXT notice from error messages
> returned by the server due to a RAISE EXCEPTION within a trigger?
>
yes
\set VERBOSITY terse
regards
Pavel Stehule
> --
> Regards,
> Peter Geoghegan
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-gene
Hello,
Is it possible to avoid seeing a CONTEXT notice from error messages
returned by the server due to a RAISE EXCEPTION within a trigger?
--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgr
hello all:
Well, i have a question if you know about this, i have a webserver in a
server and i have a database server, the question is: where should I
install the pgbouncer? in webserver, in database server or is the same?
whats your experience.
Thanks.
ISC: Mario Ignacio Rodríguez Cortés.
--
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Leonardo F wrote:
At this page:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Auto-partitioning_in_COPY
I read:
"The automatic hierarchy loading code is currently integrated
in the code of the COPY command of Postgres 8.5"
Is that true?
It might be true for Aster Data's vers
On 06/03/2010 10:05 AM, Mario Rodriguez wrote:
Well, i have a question if you know about this, i have a webserver in a
server and i have a database server, the question is: where should I
install the pgbouncer? in webserver, in database server or is the same?
what's your experience.
I haven't ha
Thanks Dim,
I didn't realise they had that package - probably because I tend to skim
over the PostgreSQL related ones, assuming they're connected with the
ready-built version. A good lesson for me.
I'm new to Debian - just switched from Red Hat as Fedora seems to be
getting monstrous and too
hello all:
Well, i have a question if you know about this, i have a webserver in a
server and i have a database server, the question is: where should I
install the pgbouncer? in webserver, in database server or is the same?
what's your experience.
Thanks.
ISC: Mario Ignacio Rodríguez Cortés.
While playing with domains and composite types, I discovered a problem
when I tried to alter a domain constraint. I don't believe that this
problem exists for traditional types.
for example:
broersr=> insert into tags values ((84,'PDSL',1,''),(84,'P',1, ''),'TEST TAG');
ERROR: invalid regular e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2010 16:00, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais" writes:
>> Shouldn't locks only be on tables/indexes that are actually used by the
>> planner ?
>
> Well, yeah, they are. The planner must take at least AccessShareLock
>
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > >> I would have
> > >> imagined that ultimately, the call to the Pg C function must return,
> > >> and therefore cannot affect stack unwinding within the C++ part of the
> > >> program.
> > >
> > > That's the whole point; a longjmp breaks the call c
Leonardo F wrote:
> At this page:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Auto-partitioning_in_COPY
>
>
> I read:
> "The automatic hierarchy loading code is currently integrated
> in the code of the COPY command of Postgres 8.5"
>
> Is that true?
It might be true for Aster Data's version of Postgr
Frank van Vugt writes:
> This doesn't seem to make sense to me, can someone explain the rationale
> behind it?
The rationale is "do what the SQL spec says" ;-)
What the spec says is
( S1 > S2 AND NOT ( S1 >= T2 AND T1 >= T2 ) )
OR
( S2 > S1 AND NOT ( S
"Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais" writes:
> Shouldn't locks only be on tables/indexes that are actually used by the
> planner ?
Well, yeah, they are. The planner must take at least AccessShareLock
on any relation referenced by the query. It might later be able to
prove that the relation ne
On 6/3/2010 5:43 AM, Jamie Lawrence-Jenner wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> In SQL Server I could copy sql code out of an application and paste it
> into SSMS, declare & assign vars that exist in the sql and run.. yay
> great debugging scenario.
>
> e.g. (please note I am rusty and syntax may be incorrect)
Hi,
I was doing some benchmarking while changing configuration options to try to
get more performance out of our postgresql servers and noticed that when
running pgbench against 8.4.3 vs 8.4.4 on identical hardware and configuration
there is a large difference in performance. I know tuning is a
On 3 Jun 2010, at 24:42, federalbird wrote:
>
> The following query is very slow in Postgres 8.4.3 as compared to Postgres
> 8.1.5. Please reply. Thanx in advance.
Did you check the output of EXPLAIN ANALYSE to see if the plans are different
between the two? Are your database settings ident
Thought I'd reformat your query for readability:
SELECT f.finance_company_name,
b.brokerage_name,
bc.quote_no AS contractnumber,
cl.first_name AS clientfirstname,
cl.last_nameAS clientlastname,
mcsh.status
"J. Bagg" writes:
> I've just had the common problem with not finding the readline library while
> compiling/linking 8.4.4 on a new linux (Debian 5 - lenny).
Tried:
apt-get build-dep postgresql-8.4
That command will install all what you need to compile your own
PostgreSQL. Some will add "and
The following query is very slow in Postgres 8.4.3 as compared to Postgres
8.1.5. Please reply. Thanx in advance.
select f.finance_company_name, b.brokerage_name, bc.quote_no as
ContractNumber, cl.first_name as ClientFirstName, cl.last_name as
ClientLastName, mcsh.status_type_cd as Contract
Ivan,
did you found your misunderstooding ? You forget how dictionaries work.
You need to put some dictionary, which recognize anything, like simple, or
stemmer dictionary to recognize 'unknown' word. Look into documentation.
Oleg
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Ivan Voras wrote:
hello,
I think I have a
Hi,
This doesn't seem to make sense to me, can someone explain the rationale
behind it?
postgres=# select version();
version
---
PostgreSQL 8.4.4 on x86_64-unknown-linux-
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 22:42, Bryan Montgomery wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm trying to get kerberos working with postgres 8.4 on openSUSE
> authenticating against AD. I have the server configured and can do a kinit
> against my account on the server. I have a keytab file produced by the
> administrators.
On 3 Jun 2010, at 12:43, Jamie Lawrence-Jenner wrote:
> Hi All
>
> In SQL Server I could copy sql code out of an application and paste it into
> SSMS, declare & assign vars that exist in the sql and run.. yay great
> debugging scenario.
>
> e.g. (please note I am rusty and syntax may be incorr
Hi All
In SQL Server I could copy sql code out of an application and paste it into
SSMS, declare & assign vars that exist in the sql and run.. yay great
debugging scenario.
e.g. (please note I am rusty and syntax may be incorrect)
declare @x as varchar(10)
set @x = 'abc'
select * from sometable
At this page:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Auto-partitioning_in_COPY
I read:
"The automatic hierarchy loading code is currently integrated
in the code of the COPY command of Postgres 8.5"
Is that true?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have some trouble understanding the locking policy with partitioned
tables. Here is a simple schema based on a real one:
CREATE DATABASE test;
\c test
CREATE TABLE test(
id integer PRIMARY KEY,
id_dummy integer,
id_part1 integer
On 06/01/2010 03:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ivan Sergio Borgonovo writes:
>> On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:47:25 -0600
>> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>> Pgsql is pretty easy to build from source.
>
>> Yeah it is. But what is it going to be an upgrade process? On a
>> production box?
>
> If it makes you feel b
David Fetter wrote:
It's good to have actual working code in production to bolster the
case that the design is sound.
How much work would it be to refactor libgeos_c to use a catch-all
exception handler?
Cheers,
David.
Given that GEOS is not used exclusively by PostGIS but also by quite a
f
Thanks for the pointer to the correct packages. I didn't realise that
the dev versions had the generic libs but, yes, you do need them for the
headers anyway.
Apologies for wasting time.
J
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscript
>
>
> > ...
> > AfterTriggerEvents: 2642403328 total in 327 blocks; 10176 free (319
> > chunks); 2642393152 used
>
> And there's the problem. Evidently you have an AFTER trigger on the
> table, and the queued events for that trigger are overrunning memory.
>
That's interesting - I don't know
44 matches
Mail list logo
