What about sth like that:
Normally the set of partitions established when initially defining the
> table is not intended to remain static. It is common to want to remove
> partitions holding old data and periodically add new partitions for new
> data. One of the most important advantages of partit
=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera writes:
> On 2025-May-13, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Another option that is often preferable is to remove the partition
>>> from the partitioned table but retain access to it as a table in its own
>>> right."
>> AFAICS, it's correct as written.
> Yeah, but maybe it woul
On 2025-May-13, Tom Lane wrote:
> PG Doc comments form writes:
> > In the paragraph:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-partitioning.html#DDL-PARTITIONING-DECLARATIVE-MAINTENANCE,
> > sentence "Another option that is often preferable is to remove the partition
> > from the partitione
Ok you are right, I get it now but still I think this can be written more
clearly.
wt., 13 maj 2025, 16:19 użytkownik Tom Lane napisał:
> PG Doc comments form writes:
> > In the paragraph:
> >
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-partitioning.html#DDL-PARTITIONING-DECLARATIVE-MAINTENAN
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/ddl-partitioning.html
Description:
In the paragraph:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-partitioning.html#DDL-PARTITIONING-DECLARATIVE-MAINTENANCE,
sentence "Another option that i
PG Doc comments form writes:
> In the paragraph:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-partitioning.html#DDL-PARTITIONING-DECLARATIVE-MAINTENANCE,
> sentence "Another option that is often preferable is to remove the partition
> from the partitioned table but retain access to it as a table
On Tuesday, May 13, 2025, PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/ddl-partitioning.html
> Description:
>
> In the paragraph:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-partitioning.
> html#DD
>>> "Another way to archive is to use a custom archive module as the
>>> archive_library"
>>
>> shouldn't this read:
>> "Another way to archive this is to use a custom archive module as the
>> archive_library"
>That would be worse than the original. What is "this"?
>I'd suggest "Another way to
On Mon, 2023-10-30 at 13:15 +, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> "Another way to archive is to use a custom archive module as the
> archive_library"
>
> shouldn't this read:
> "Another way to archive this is to use a custom archive module as the
> archive_library"
That would be worse than th
Hi,
"Another way to archive is to use a custom archive module as the
archive_library"
shouldn't this read:
"Another way to archive this is to use a custom archive module as the
archive_library"
Regards
Daniel
10 matches
Mail list logo
