On Tuesday, May 13, 2025, PG Doc comments form <nore...@postgresql.org> wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/ddl-partitioning.html > Description: > > In the paragraph: > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-partitioning. > html#DDL-PARTITIONING-DECLARATIVE-MAINTENANCE, > sentence "Another option that is often preferable is to remove the > partition > from the partitioned table but retain access to it as a table in its own > right." there is missing "not" word. Correct form of this sentence should > be: Another option that is often preferable is to not remove the partition > from the partitioned table but retain access to it as a table in its own > right. > The existing wording is correct. The fact it immediately precedes a detach partition command example should make this abundantly clear. Though adding “not” as you’ve done doesn’t make any sense regardless - it is a self-contradiction to both be a partition and independent (on its own right). David J.
