=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvhe...@kurilemu.de> writes:
> On 2025-May-13, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Another option that is often preferable is to remove the partition
>>> from the partitioned table but retain access to it as a table in its own
>>> right."
>> AFAICS, it's correct as written.
> Yeah, but maybe it would be clearer if the word "remove" were "detach".
> I don't find the phrase "remove the partition from the partitioned
> table" particulary suggestive of what's being described.
Hm, maybe, but would that be putting too much emphasis on "detach" because
it's the command keyword?
regards, tom lane
