Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn

2010-04-04 Thread Umar Ijaz
this link might be useful http://www.techarena.in/guide/16768-how-start-programming-language-choose.htm On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Stewart Robertson wrote: > Your thoughts, if you please... > > I've been reading various threads/articles discussing the pros and cons > of learning/writing i

Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn

2010-03-22 Thread Mark Rogers
On 17/03/10 16:44, Martin Nix wrote (on the subject of K&R C books): > I concur with you Mark - anybody out there with a first edition ? I just found my copy over the weekend - definitely looks like a first edition. I also found my copy of Bjarne Stroustrup's C++ book which also looks like it m

Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn

2010-03-17 Thread Andrew Clark
...@mailman.lug.org.uk [mailto:peterboro-boun...@mailman.lug.org.uk] On Behalf Of Steve Tompkins-MacQueen Sent: 17 March 2010 21:38 To: Peterborough LUG - No commercial posts Subject: Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn On 17 Mar 2010, at 15:51, Andrew Clark wrote: Steve wrote

Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn

2010-03-17 Thread Steve Tompkins-MacQueen
Tompkins-MacQueen > Sent: 17 March 2010 00:06 > To: Peterborough LUG - No commercial posts > Subject: Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn > > I started programming when 1980/81 on TRS-80, ZX-81 and RM-380 the 2 things > all of these had in common was a Z80 CPU mechincode and

Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn

2010-03-17 Thread Tony Cowderoy
It's probably better to get the ANSI C edition. Some things in the original K&R are no longer considered good practice. Some of them may even generate an error message from a modern compiler unless you have set a K&R compatibility option. Tony On 17/03/2010 19:48, Stewart Robertson wrote: > BTW

Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn

2010-03-17 Thread Stewart Robertson
BTW, I still think it's one of the best beginners books on C and it's about a quarter of the thickness of most modern ones. There's second hand copies available on Amazon. With such responses I'm tempted to part with a tenner for a second hand copy. "All of that said, many of the skills are tr

Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn

2010-03-17 Thread Tony Cowderoy
I think mine must be. In the front it says "Copyright (c) 1978 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated" and that it was typeset on a PDP-11/70. Is that a first ed? BTW, I still think it's one of the best beginners books on C and it's about a quarter of the thickness of most modern ones. Tony

Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn

2010-03-17 Thread Martin Nix
I concur with you Mark - anybody out there with a first edition ? Martin On 17 March 2010 16:08, Mark Rogers wrote: > On 17/03/10 15:51, Andrew Clark wrote: > > I leant it from K&R but that’s going back a bit... > > I think a lot of us will have learned C from the K&R book, and I think > there'

Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn

2010-03-17 Thread Mark Rogers
On 17/03/10 15:51, Andrew Clark wrote: > I leant it from K&R but that’s going back a bit... I think a lot of us will have learned C from the K&R book, and I think there's still a lot to be said for it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_C_Programming_Language_(book) ISBN: 9780131103627 -- Mark R

Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn

2010-03-17 Thread Andrew Clark
ial posts Subject: Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn I started programming when 1980/81 on TRS-80, ZX-81 and RM-380 the 2 things all of these had in common was a Z80 CPU mechincode and BASIC BY 1998 I had started a HND in computer and comuation hardware and software engernering and h

Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn

2010-03-17 Thread Mark Rogers
On 16/03/10 21:09, Stewart Robertson wrote: > I am not in a hurry to learn a language for the sake of it On 17/03/10 00:05, Steve Tompkins-MacQueen wrote: > witch language should I lern? > > Answer: depends on what computer and OS you whant the program to run > on, what you want to do and how yo

Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn

2010-03-16 Thread Steve Tompkins-MacQueen
I started programming when 1980/81 on TRS-80, ZX-81 and RM-380 the 2 things all of these had in common was a Z80 CPU mechincode and BASIC BY 1998 I had started a HND in computer and comuation hardware and software engernering and had to get to grips with C and a year latter started C++ Now I'm

Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn

2010-03-16 Thread Umar Ijaz
Quite a few years back i started a degree in computer science and the language that was chosen by the faculty was C. C is a good starter language. But now I think C++ could be a better language if you want to start dipping your toes. I currently use C++ as a hobbyist :-P I am still learning dif

Re: [Peterboro] Programming language to learn

2010-03-16 Thread Tony Vroon
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 21:09 +, Stewart Robertson wrote: > So far I have come to the conclusion that C is a good option because it > is used in a lot of important stuff and runs quickly. Another good point about C is that GCC gives very useful compiler warnings for it. I find that the warnings

[Peterboro] Programming language to learn

2010-03-16 Thread Stewart Robertson
Your thoughts, if you please... I've been reading various threads/articles discussing the pros and cons of learning/writing in various programming languages (C, C++, Java, Python, Perl, Ruby, PHP etc.) I do not have huge amounts of time to devote to learning a particular language but at the sa