Glenn Linderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> An idea that produces a paired feeling would be to use one of the
> paired character pairs, as in "#<" and ">#".
> ...the three paired character possibilities ("<>", "()", "{}")
There is at least one more: "[]".
And the Perlish thing to do
Kirrily Robert said:
> What relationship does this have to RFC 5 (multiline comments), and
> hasn't the discussion of inline comments occurred in detail already?
There is a distinction, because the proposal for multiline comments requires
(like all here docs) the opening and closing be on their o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 11:27:35PM -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
> >
> >Inline Comments for Perl.
>
> What relationship does this have to RFC 5 (multiline comments), and
> hasn't the discussion of inline comments occurred in detail already?
Highly related. But sin
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 11:27:35PM -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
>
>Inline Comments for Perl.
What relationship does this have to RFC 5 (multiline comments), and
hasn't the discussion of inline comments occurred in detail already?
K.
--
Kirrily Robert -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://netiz
