[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 11:27:35PM -0000, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
> >
> >Inline Comments for Perl.
>
> What relationship does this have to RFC 5 (multiline comments), and
> hasn't the discussion of inline comments occurred in detail already?
Highly related. But since the RFC 5 wasn't extended after discussion of
both multiline comments and in-line comments to include in-line comments,
I wrote RFC 102 to complement it, and capture that part of the discussion
that pertained to in-line comments.
Because of the prior discussion, I doubt there will be much additional
discussion of RFC 102, if any.
Mr. Matthews (author of RFC 5) and I thought this would be an appropriate
way to keep the features separable yet complementary.
> K.
>
> --
> Kirrily Robert -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://netizen.com.au/
> Open Source development, consulting and solutions
> Level 10, 500 Collins St, Melbourne VIC 3000
> Phone: +61 3 9614 0949 Fax: +61 3 9614 0948 Mobile: +61 410 664 994
--
Glenn
=====
There are two kinds of people, those
who finish what they start, and so
on... -- Robert Byrne
_____NetZero Free Internet Access and Email______
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
