Kirrily Robert said:
> What relationship does this have to RFC 5 (multiline comments), and
> hasn't the discussion of inline comments occurred in detail already?
There is a distinction, because the proposal for multiline comments requires
(like all here docs) the opening and closing be on their own line -- thereby
forcing multiline commenmts to be multiline.
To clarify the distinction (as I see Glenn's proposal):
#end-of-line comment, terminates at newline\n
#<inline comment, cannot contain a newline>#
#<<TOKEN;
multiline comments: RFC is now frozen, so don't discuss this!
TOKEN
I'll just quietly duck down here in my bunker while the List "discusses"
this :-)
--Michael
