Simon Cozens wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 09:47:51PM -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
> > I am a fan of Perl and like what I see of the core C# _language_.
> > What I propose is to move Perl in the C# direction.
>
> So, this is the comedy RFC, eh?
Indeed.
Since you quoted a couple of m
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 09:47:51PM -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
> I am a fan of Perl and like what I see of the core C# _language_.
> What I propose is to move Perl in the C# direction.
So, this is the comedy RFC, eh?
--
DEC diagnostics would run on a dead whale.
-- Mel Fer
On Friday, September 29, 2000 4:48 PM, Perl6 RFC Librarian
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> This and other RFCs are available on the web at
> http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
>
> =head1 TITLE
>
> Merge Perl and C#, but have default Main class for scripting.
>
> =head1 VERSION
>
> Maintainer: Timothy
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
Merge Perl and C#, but have default Main class for scripting.
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Timothy Covell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 29 Sep 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: 352
Version: 1
--| UML is extremely useful as a design language. I wonder, though, how
--| a distributed collaborative effort can utilize it.
i think that what has to happen is that some one (larry, Dan, anyone?) comes
up with a top level object decompostion and then those boxes get farmed out
to people to fil
At 03:23 PM 9/29/00 -0400, ye, wei wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > At 02:29 PM 9/29/00 +0100, David Mitchell wrote:
> > >Regarding the tentative list of vtable functions:
> > >I'm rather worried about binary operators, eg 'is_equal', 'add' etc.
> > >The danger with these is that they may impose
Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> I've no experience with UML, though. Got a pointer to a quick overview?
Without a doubt, "UML Distilled" is the bible of the genre.
I'll make a pitch, though, for O'Reilly's "UML in a Nutshell", which
I have; it's a decent little tutorial and reference.
UML is extremely
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 12:37:15PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 04:13 PM 9/29/00 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >Are you suggesting that the attributes use the same mapping system as
> >the XS (or son-of-XS (XS++)) typemaps in lib/ExtUtils/typemap?
> >If so, will there be the "terse" column in
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 02:29 PM 9/29/00 +0100, David Mitchell wrote:
> >Regarding the tentative list of vtable functions:
> >I'm rather worried about binary operators, eg 'is_equal', 'add' etc.
> >The danger with these is that they may impose a single implementation
> >of scalars upon us.
> >
>
> >
> >Try Martin Fowler's UML Distilled, very good and short!
>
> Is it available electronically, or do I need to trot over to Quantum Books
> and drop some cash on it? (Man, they love me there...) If it's paper, got
> an ISBN?
>
uhm unfortunately it'll cost you its about $30USD (i fortunately
At 10:32 AM 9/29/00 -0700, Peter Buckingham wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> > At 04:17 PM 9/28/00 -0400, John Porter wrote:
> > > > I think, though, that the core interface should be procedural.
> > >
> > >I agree. We should not confuse OOD with OOP.
> >
> > Fair enough, and I was.
> >
> > I've
Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> At 04:17 PM 9/28/00 -0400, John Porter wrote:
> > > I think, though, that the core interface should be procedural.
> >
> >I agree. We should not confuse OOD with OOP.
>
> Fair enough, and I was.
>
> I've no experience with UML, though. Got a pointer to a quick overview?
At 04:17 PM 9/28/00 -0400, John Porter wrote:
> > I think, though, that the core interface should be procedural.
>
>I agree. We should not confuse OOD with OOP.
Fair enough, and I was.
I've no experience with UML, though. Got a pointer to a quick overview?
At 04:13 PM 9/29/00 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>Are you suggesting that the attributes use the same mapping system as
>the XS (or son-of-XS (XS++)) typemaps in lib/ExtUtils/typemap?
>If so, will there be the "terse" column in the typemap file to associate
>"i" with "T_IV" ?
Hadn't considered it
At 02:29 PM 9/29/00 +0100, David Mitchell wrote:
>Regarding the tentative list of vtable functions:
>I'm rather worried about binary operators, eg 'is_equal', 'add' etc.
>The danger with these is that they may impose a single implementation
>of scalars upon us.
>
>As an example, suppose I wrote an
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 08:59:58PM -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
> =head1 DESCRIPTION
>
> Any sub that has the appropriate attribute can be called from C (or some other
> compiled language). Perl will automagically convert the input
> parameters (which is what the attributes tells us) to thin
Regarding the tentative list of vtable functions:
I'm rather worried about binary operators, eg 'is_equal', 'add' etc.
The danger with these is that they may impose a single implementation
of scalars upon us.
As an example, suppose I wrote an alternative scalar implementation that
was optimised f
17 matches
Mail list logo
