--| UML is extremely useful as a design language. I wonder, though, how --| a distributed collaborative effort can utilize it. i think that what has to happen is that some one (larry, Dan, anyone?) comes up with a top level object decompostion and then those boxes get farmed out to people to fill in. when they've been filled in they have something similar to the RFC process for comments and criticisms and are refined. --| Anyone know of any --| open-source web-enabled UML tools? Or do I gotta write one --| myself? :-) I had used visio myself in the past, definitely not open source :-( but i did a quick check and there is a visio style program that is covered by the GPL Dia (http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/) i have not used it, but it may be simpler than just doing everything from scratch in xfig. peter
- RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should Have W... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Shou... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl C... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Pe... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Pe... John Porter
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in t... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... 'John Porter'
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Bart Schuller
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Tim Bunce
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Sam Tregar
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Dan Sugalski