rk as an assertation, instead of having this
strange "as if" thing?
-=- James Mastros,
theorbtwo
p calling out to the smartmatcher.
Possibly we should make the syntax be a smart match, but only require that
conformat implementations implement ranges and integers.
-=- James Mastros
uot;environment variable" is something
in %*ENV. An "environmental variable" is a variable which was declared with
env $foo, and which can be seen by callers.
I rather dislike this naming scheme, but can't think of a better one.
-=- James Mastros
3 legal perl6? my ($foo, undef, $bar) =
1..3; is valid perl5, but AFAIK that is completely undocumented. (It's
quite useful from time to time -- now if only my (@rest, $almost, $last) =
function_returning_many_thingies could work...
-=- James Mastros
be terribly common such that the extra cognative
overhead is worth it, come to think of it.
I withdraw the (stupid) suggestion.
-=- James Mastros
ften.
Also, as a checklist for proposals. If you're thinking of proposing
something, go look there. If it's already there, do you have any new pros
to put against the existing cons?
-=- James Mastros
can run freely in the end-user's account. Think
cgi_wrapper without spawning a new interpreter.
-=- James Mastros
--
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GU>CS d->-- s-:- a20 C++ UL+++@ P+++>+ L++@ E-() N o? K? w@ M-- !V
PS++ PE Y+ PGP(-) t++@ 5+ X+++ R+ tv+ b+++ DI+ D+ G e>++ h! r- y?
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
ly get
the location of the AUTOLOADER sub and not where the sub being autoloaded
was acatualy written.
Most of the rest would require siginificant overhead on all programs that
might get debugged (the debugger is a module; you don't necessarly have to
start it from the commandline). Us
nd
non-greedy, lazy assertations. If you came up with a good way to specify
along both axes, I think we'd have a winner.
-=- James Mastros
--
midendian: She never sleeps.
mousetrout: But I do. I just regret it after I wake up.
AIM: theorbtwo homepage: http://www.rtweb.net/theorb/
ICBM: 40:04:15.100 N, 76:18:53.165 W
lowing here. It seems that in
the vast majority of all cases, you'd need to compile (or at the very least,
parse) the entire regex. Also, you can get /vast/ efficency gains by
compiling a regex, so you can check the easy things first.
-=- James Mastros
--
midendian: She never sleep
ns. I
personaly would prefer to see units of seconds, a basepoint of 1/1/1970, and
resolution and accuracy best-reasonably-available.)
If you really want time() to do what it did before, you can always say:
sub time {int (CORE::time()) + };
Indeed, a perl5::time module that does exactly that mi
change the meaning of time() slightly without changing to a
different function name? Yes, it will silently break some existing code,
but that's OK -- remember, 90% with traslation, 75% without. being in that
middle 15% isn't a bad thing.
-=- James Mastros
--
"My country
s result slightly differently is not "not
keeping perl perl", nor is it not keeping time time; changing time() such
that it did somthing radicly different (like returning time-of-day instead)
would be changing it's soul.
And I don't think we should be keeping code-level compatablit
't modify it. And if you try, you don't error, you
recruse. And perl will happily recruse until you run out of memory, and VB
will give a stack overflow, and take down the IDE and your code unless
you're careful.
-=- James Mastros
--
"My country 'tis of thee, of y&#x
AC address of
the network card, and some other random stuff).
I think the current method is probably best for us.
-=- James Mastros
--
"My country 'tis of thee, of y'all i'm rappin'! Lan where my brothers
fought, land where our King was shot -- from every buildi
#x27;s SysV IPC scheme into perl. (And I
don't even know what XPG4 is.)
Speaking of contract names, is Damien about?
-=- James Mastros
--
"My country 'tis of thee, of y'all i'm rappin'! Lan where my brothers
fought, land where our King was shot -- from eve
contain two
consecutive colons. (or "'"s, but that's going to be thrown out, I assume).
-=- James Mastros
--
"My country 'tis of thee, of y'all i'm rappin'! Lan where my brothers
fought, land where our King was shot -- from every building
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 05:01:29PM -0600, David L. Nicol wrote:
> > A /much/ better syntax, in [John Mastros's] humble opinion. However,
"James", BTW. (No, I don't really care.)
> > $__ must act sanely when we're called as an inner function (IE foo(bar(42)
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 05:30:59PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> James Mastros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > And I always hated that about VB and Pascal -- you can assign to the magic
> > variable, but can't modify it.
>
> That was before the invention of a
it's independent of the sub's name. I wish this could be
> extended to doing recursive calls without having to say the subs own
> name, again.
I agree, making the magic variable be the name of the sub is a bad idea.
Your idea for a name for the currently executing sub is interesting, I
thin
ffer is two magic values, $^R and @^R. And, as
sombodyoranother pointed out, @^R can't be a real array, only a list. (I
don't think that will be a problem, though.)
> [stuff about manual vs. automatic return-stack elminition]
Yeah, you're probably right. But return-as-assignment
ormation
on scopes that caller doesn't (IE any scope not a do, require, eval, or
sub-call.)
-=- James Mastros
--
"My country 'tis of thee, of y'all i'm rappin'! Lan where my brothers
fought, land where our King was shot -- from every building top, le
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 08:43:02PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:46:48AM -0500, James Mastros wrote:
> > By the time you get to the last line, you've already forgoten WTF you named
> > the return variable.
> Eh, I don't think that b
No | Yes |
No. (Source packages are signed, though.) (At present, feature is planned
for future, and shouldn't be all that hard.)
-=- James Mastros
--
"All I really want is somebody to curl up with and pretend the world is a
safe place."
AIM: theorbtwo homepage: http://www.rtweb.net/theorb/
sumers, assumedly)
licenced code from RSA. However, it shouldn't be a problem, since RSA's
pattent (in the US, anyway, and I don't think they pattented anywhere else)
has timed out.
-=- James Mastros
--
"All I really want is somebody to curl up with and pretend the world
them that knows how to do special things with
files in that directory (like set up symlinks from the normal man dirs).
BTW, this plan would make it painful to do with perl5 setups, since they
commonly have odd dir structures.
-=- James Mastros
--
"All I really want is somebody to cur
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 06:56:47PM -0300, Branden wrote:
> James Mastros wrote:
> > magical "install" script in them that knows how to do special things with
> > files in that directory (like set up symlinks from the normal man dirs).
>
> That probably should be
uctor)
Fiat?
It's pretty hard (for me) to think of when you'd want an AUTOLOADed DESTROY,
since if you create /any/ objects of the class, DESTROY will be called.
"It isn't possible to AUTOLOAD DESTROY." --perlmem(6)
-=- James Mastros
--
"All I really want is so
(cond) { somthing } }.
CATCH is just shorthand.
> - What's the return value? With RFC 88 you can say:
The return value is undef (or empty-list) until you hit a return statement.
If the code dies before returning, then it stays undef/() unless somthing
run after that (IE a CATCH/POS
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 01:09:11PM -0500, John Porter wrote:
> > James Mastros wrote:
> > >"It isn't possible to AUTOLOAD DESTROY." --perlmem(6)
[Note: that's a hypothetical quote.]
> I'm not sure what that means. Certainly AUTOLOAD gets
> called
with a message about ``This object was already
> DESTROYed.''.
I think an ordinary "attempt to dereference undef" will work.
-=- James Mastros
--
"All I really want is somebody to curl up with and pretend the world is a
safe place."
AIM: theorbtwo homepage: http://www.rtweb.net/theorb/
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 09:59:31AM -0500, John Porter wrote:
> James Mastros wrote:
> > I'd think that an extension to delete is in order here. Basicly, delete
> > should DESTROY the arg, change it's value to undef,...
> Huh? What delete are you thinking of? This is
tly GC.
3) Automatic -- Certian runtime events, not directly (or obviously) related
to the flow of execution, like when the number of SVs created or the
amount of memory allocated since the last GC run exced a certian critical
value.
(I /think/ a dictionary would agree with me, but I'm not about to get pissy
and look them up.)
I was saying that we should do 1 and 3, but not 2.
-=- James Mastros
hat there would be a "invalid" marker of some sort.
It's neccessary (I think) for a pool, which I assumed. Bad James, bad.
-=- James Mastros
--
"All I really want is somebody to curl up with and pretend the world is a
safe place."
AIM: theorbtwo homepage: http://www.rtweb.net/theorb/
t; is immediate).
I'm fond of post, myself. Simply means "subsequent to", literaly (m-w.com,
post-, 2a. Yes, I'm anal sometimes.) "Always" makes me say "but when", and
"later" seems like the wrong part-of-speech to me.
-=- James Mastros
--
t;sub {}"s.)
Indeed,
map $_->[0], sort {&$sort($a->[1], $b->[1])} map [$_, &$attrib($_)], @list;
does what I intendeded. (Where ex $sort = sub {$_[0] cmp $_[1]}, and
$attrib = sub {lc $_}.) (Of course, this doesn't always use the optimal
form.)
-=- James Mastr
] elem, and extract the ->[1] elem. Thus, it might not be as
effecent as a hand-crafted schwartzian, but will be at least as efficent as
a naieve straight sort (except in pathalogical cases, like tsort((^_),
(^_<=>^_), @list)).
-=- James Mastros
--
The most beautiful thing we c
g out of his head
> and hiding behind the bookcase)
That's a really wierd image. Twisted, even.
-=- James Mastros
--
The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger,
who can no longer pa
Then again, if you think of objects (in the OO sense) as doing things, then
they normaly are the subject, and _not_ the indirect-object (in the english
sense).
(Note, BTW, that both my german and my lingustics aren't so hot.)
-=- James Mastros
--
The most beautiful thing we can experi
n
indicator that you should be using that schwartz thang.
-=- James Mastros
--
The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger,
who can no longer pause to wonder and stand wrapt in awe, is as
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:31:22PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 04:04 PM 3/26/2001 -0500, James Mastros wrote:
> >The only way f(a) can not be stable and f(a) <=> f(b) can be is somthing of
> >a corner case. In fact, it's a lot of a corner case.
> You're ig
")=123456
f(f("+123,456))=123456
The functon is not idempotent. Even if you checked f(x)==x (function is the
identity), an input of "123456" would work.
-=- James Mastros
--
The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true
>my_compare(b,c) < 0, then it should also be the case that
> >my_compare(a,c) < 0
I can't define it better then that. (Though there's more to it then that).
Note that only the sign of the answer is gaurnteed, so it doesn't even have
to be interna
that increment a
counter every time they are accessed, for example.)
I think that the difference between 4&3 dosn't matter. We only have things
in 4 and not 3 that vary in abs(), but not sign.
We're left with 1&2, and for 1, the sort won't work anyway.
So long as we consid
te such as
:simple or :stateless. So let it be spoken, so let it be done.
This isn't any more preverse then the "you can't assign to constants" rule.
-=- James Mastros
--
The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 05:57:30PM -0500, James Mastros wrote:
> [A bunch of stuff]
Oh, and I agree with sombody else on this thread that unless otherwise
stated, the sort should always assume statelessness (and thus the ability to
cache at will). If it's trivial to see that the sort
dvanced garbage collector, just like
> Scheme or Strongtalk compiler?
We want to make it as fast as reasonably possible. Writing a native
compiler might not be _reasonably_ possible. And an advanced GC will almost
certianly be part of perl6; they're orthogonal issues.
-=-
arison for the same
> arguments.
Ahh, bingo. That's what a number of people (inculding me) are suggesting --
a :functional / :pure / :stateless / :somthingelseIdontrecall attribute
attachable to a sub.
-=- James Mastros
--
The most beautiful thing we can experience is the myster
o english as a command
form, telling the Cow to speak. (If you translate both -> and ' ' into a
comma.)
Anyway, I'm trying to argue lingustics in a perl ML, with zero training.
Is there a linguist in the house? (Hm, didn't Larry go to Japan to learn a
language with wierd
a better system, use
a site-policy file, or bite the bullet and change the #! lines.
-=- James Mastros
--
The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger,
who can no longer pause to wond
't symlink
bunzip -> bunzip2 and bzip -> bzip2 and have it do the Right Thing. On the
gripping hand, when combined with other mesures, not so bad.
-=- James Mastros
--
The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and science. H
you
really want to be able to read from a URL in one line, let yourself do
. But make opening a URL an explicit act.
> But I really mustn't spill too many half-digested beans here. :-)
If you have to, at least do it in the toilet.
> P.S. Larry's Second Law of Language Rede
ewhere on these threads: What does changing to "." from -> buy us?
I can see that "." is shorter to type then ->, but, say, \ would be just as
good. I can't really say changing because "." is more standard. It isn't
standard to C or perl5. It's possible to misparse "." as concat with "." as
a sepperator on version-strings, but that's more of a problem with using it
for method-call.
-=- James Mastros
If you want that, you could go with `, which could produce some
ambiguity, both with qx and with ', which looks very similar in many fonts.
BTW, I think that considering no-whitespace cases of indirect object is
quite silly -- does anybody acatualy use that?
This is the first I thought it wasn't a syntax error.
-=- James Mastros
and I think the use of := agrees with what is planned.
It also avoids the use of a verbose .next (and the dot, which I still don't
like ).
-=- James Mastros
ive), so I'd rather we stay with:
>$a = <$b>; # same as next $b or $b.next
> Hey, maybe we can convince Larry... ;-)
I'd tend to agree. Especialy that we don't need a qw() alternative.
However, I don't think Larry's in a convincable mood -- coughdotcough.
-=- James Mastros
9 !097!0!9080"; would
stop looking after it had found and returned 0!0 and 9, and never even
glance at the 98. Basicly, if you assign to a list of lvalues, @returnlist,
it
will stop looking after it has found scalar(@returnlist) matches or
end-of-input.
-=- James Mastros
).
That lets us keep for somthing iteratorish, which saves
special-caseing (I do occasionaly use a qw list with one element),
and lets us keep continuity.
Anyway, I'm fairly certian that I'll use iterators more then qw lists.
-=- James Mastros
ers) within one file, and having perl5 being another parser. Put them
together, and you get exactly this.
-=- James Mastros
sing
the comma operator. (Or did we get rid of the comma operator when
I wasn't paying attention?) If we do have @foo[(stuff)] make stuff
be in list context, then that'd be a special case (I think).
-=- James Mastros
it would be a plain hash, with funny-
character included in the key.
-=- James Mastros
intended for, it seems like a very concise,
> expressive way to do multiple relationship tests without needing all those
> "&&"s and such.
Indeed. (Though, as defined above, this won't work on the string
operations, only the numerics.)
-=- James Mastros
ly real benifit I see is typing ease, and -> isn't that
hard to type. That's what editor macros are for.
It's rather unfornate that we've run out of characters to use
for operators, but we've got to deal with it better then flipping
around operators willy-nilly.
-=- James Mastros
${D} instead of BUILDPREFIX=${D} does allow
the install to complete. But I wonder what the correct results
should be when both DESTDIR and BUILDPREFIX are specified to make?
-JimC
--
James H. Cloos, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ements, but
it compares as a range. 1.1 should ~~ 1..2; pugs thinking that's false is a
bug, not a feature.
Of course, that doesn't mean implementing range in a subset of perl6 without
it isn't interesting, and possibly useful for bootstrapping.
-=- James Mastros
name than 'regex'.
[...]
> Maybe 'match' is a better keyword.
Can I suggest we keep match meaning thing you get when you run a thingy
against a string, and make "matcher" be the thingy that gets run?
100% agree with you, Allison; thanks for putting words to "doesn't feel
right".
-=- James Mastros
On May 17, 2006, at 2:15 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
Hi everyone,
We setup a perl6-users mailing list. It'll be our first list for
perl6 "users" (as opposed to implementors). Of course I hope the
implementors will join too and help the users. :-)
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subscribe.
At this stage, are binaries even worth it? Judging from my lurking
on #perl6, things are moving so fast that anything but a regular
nightly-built binary would be too out of date. Seems like svn is
the way to go.
-James
At 11:58 AM -0400 5/19/06, Chris Yocum wrote:
Hi All,
I just
Is any document yet that gets you to the point of running a perl6 'hello
world'?
-james
run make
test, etc). But new users might not know that perl6=pugs right now and
haskell is needed. And where parrot fits in...
-james
Finally got my hello-world-foo on in OS X:
Haskell from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/6.4.1/MacOSX/GHC-6.4.1.pkg.zip
parrot from svn
pugs from svn
My preferred enivronment would have been FreeBSD 6.1, but I can't the the
ghc port to build (nor is there a package) :(
--
James Pere
ould have a s/z/s/ version, for
those who speak a z-impared dialect of English.)
-=- James Mastros
On Nov 11, 2006, at 5:56 AM, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
I believe that the attachment containing your make output was
truncated.
Can you try again or just inline the make error(s)?
See below. It should be noted that I upgraded to GMP 4.2.1. before
trying to build Parrot (or, more prec
Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> I believe that the attachment containing your make output was
truncated.
> Can you try again or just inline the make error(s)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -J
>
At Jerry Gay's suggestion, I did a 'make clean' and started anew.
Compiling with:
xx.c
cc -I./include -fno-common -no-cpp
On Dec 30, 2006, at 1:06 AM, Kevin Tew via RT wrote:
I modified the root.in changes to follow the conventions already
present
in the file.
The following composite patch builds and passes parrot tests.
However the pmc2cutil tests are not passing. Could you post a new
diff
that includes pa
On Dec 30, 2006, at 2:56 PM, chromatic via RT wrote:
Here's what I get on an x86 Linux machine:
/usr/bin/perl t/harness t/tools/pmc2cutils/00-qualify.t
[snip]
t/tools/pmc2cutils/01-pmc2cutils.
# Failed test (t/tools/pmc2cutils/01-pmc2cutils.t at line 48)
# Parrot::Pmc2c::Utils->c
README
Description: Binary data
MANIFEST.patch
Description: Binary data
Following a suggestion made earlier today by Coke, I am submitting
this file for t/tools/pmc2utils/.
kid51
On Dec 30, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
Perhaps a helpful failure message when run at the wrong time would
help.
In a patch to t/tools/pmc2cutils/00-qualify.t which I just submitted,
I have included such an explanatory message which will print out if
you run it with 'p
On Dec 30, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
Perhaps a helpful failure message when run at the wrong time would
help.
And, inspired by your t/perl/README, I have submitted one for t/tools/
pmc2cutils/.
kid51
On Dec 30, 2006, at 1:06 AM, Kevin Tew via RT wrote:
I modified the root.in changes to follow the conventions already
present
in the file.
Kevin, I had hoped that creating a 'make' target in config/gen/
makefiles/root.in would provide a convenient way to run my tests of
Parrot::Pmc2c::
On Jan 7, 2007, at 8:44 AM, Steve Peters via RT wrote:
What is your c++ symlink pointing at?
[parrot] 512 $ ls -l /usr/bin/c++
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7 Aug 9 2004 /usr/bin/c++ -> g++-3.3
[parrot] 513 $ ls -l /usr/bin/g++-3.3
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 135816 May 14 2006 /usr/bin/g
On Jan 11, 2007, at 9:21 AM, Steve Peters via RT wrote:
On Sun Jan 07 08:27:28 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2007, at 8:44 AM, Steve Peters via RT wrote:
What is your c++ symlink pointing at?
[parrot] 512 $ ls -l /usr/bin/c++
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7 Aug 9 2004 /usr/b
Following my refactoring of tools/build/pmc2c.pl, particle asked me
to look at phalanxing a couple of the other build tools: ops2pm.pl
and ops2c.pl. Since ops2pm.pl is invoked at the very beginning of
the 'make' process, I decided to focus there. As was the case with
pmc2c.pl, my strate
For the first time in the two months I've been working on Parrot,
'make test' completely succeeded -- and with some TODO tests passing,
to boot!
All tests successful (18 subtests UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 11 tests
and 605 subtests skipped.
Passed TODOStat Wstat TODOs Pas
# New Ticket Created by "James Bence"
# Please include the string: [perl #41292]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41292 >
The test t/codingstd/trailing_space.t fails on two files. This patch m
On Jan 31, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
People with general experience in dynamic languages are also good:
they pick up PIR quickly.
Which leads to my next questions:
Given a knowledge of a dynamic language (I believe there's one called
Perl 5), what is the trajectory for l
On Feb 6, 2007, at 2:27 PM, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 17:54 schrieb Allison Randal:
This is a failing test Leo added in r16783. It looks to me like
calling:
o = new 'MyClass', $P0
actually should call init_pmc, rather than init, even when $P0 is
null.
On Feb 6, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
Failing that, a PIR tutorial is a good project for someone to take
on. You interested in working on it?
E ... I'm the one who *needs* the tutorial, not the one to write it.
See attached output of prove -v. I have not encountered these
failures before tonight.
Updated to revision 17318.
[parrot] 526 $ prove -v t/pmc/smop_*.t
t/pmc/smop_attribute1..5
# Failed test (t/pmc/smop_attribute.t at line 26)
# got: 'sh: line 1: ./parrot: No such file or dir
On Mar 4, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Sam Vilain wrote:
James Keenan wrote:
The patch attached is really two patches in one:
1. A resubmission in patch form of my refactoring of tools/build/
ops2c.pl into lib/Parrot/Ops2c/Utils.pm and lib/Parrot/Ops2c/
Auxiliary.pm, along with a test suite in t/tools
Here are some notes which I have made which may prove useful in the
refactoring of Parrot::Distribution. I hope that I have grepped and
acked accurately, but I'm not guaranteeing 100% accuracy.
kid51
NAME
Parrot::Distribution refactoring notes
ANALYSIS OF PACKAGE
* used by:
On Mar 9, 2007, at 10:42 AM, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
On Mon Mar 05 16:57:47 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two months ago, I filed this bug report (excerpt):
I'm still not seeing the effects of the bug you describe, btw. (on
OS X
intel or ppc). It does remind me of issues I had when atte
On Mar 9, 2007, at 10:42 AM, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
Do you still get the bug when you revert the change to Configure.pl?
This morning, I checked out a fresh version from trunk: r17419. I
ran myconfigure.sh, which internally called the HEAD version of
Configure.pl.
#!/bin/sh
I got errors in 5 different tests running 'make test' this morning on
a tree freshly updated from trunk. An excerpt from 'make test'
output is attached.
Set aside the failure in t/perl/Parrot_Distribution.t; that's well
known. Here's the output of 'prove -v' on the other 4 files:
[parro
On Mar 24, 2007, at 11:38 AM, chromatic wrote:
We're probably just working around something weird on your system;
it would be
nice if we could figure out what it is and fix it for you.
Is it possible to get a diff between the two configurations
generated with and
without this patch?
On Mar 24, 2007, at 11:53 PM, chromatic wrote:
On Saturday 24 March 2007 09:06, James Keenan wrote:
< ld='c++', ldflags=' -L/usr/local/lib
-L/Users/jimk/work/fresh/blib/lib -flat_namespace ', ---
ld='/usr/bin/g++-3.3', ldflags=' -L/usr/local
On Mar 25, 2007, at 1:41 PM, Klaas-Jan Stol via RT wrote:
hi, I'm maintaining compilers/pirc. The pirc.in file (from which the
Makefile is generated) does contain:
realclean: clean
$(RM_RF) Makefile
$(RM_RF) pirc$(EXE)
When I type 'make realclean' (in compilers/pirc dir.) it does
de
. So far, it looks like a
very nice list -- high signal, low noize, and it's possible to keep it
all straight in your head.
-=- James Mastros
e a list returns it's last element
whereas an array returns it's size, because it simply ain't so, and
causes confusion. (I'd write an RFC suggesting that the scalar comma op
dies, but it's too late, and I'm sure somebody already did. Anyway,
that's a p6l thing too.)
-=- James Mastros
hat last point.) This whole paragraph might properly be pushed
off to the discussion of Num in Bool context later.)
-=- James Mastros
1 - 100 of 2130 matches
Mail list logo
