Fwd: [CPAN Upload: S/SM/SMPETERS/Bundle-Phalanx-0.05.tar.gz: upload@pause.perl.org]

2003-12-27 Thread andy
So can someone tell me what the Bundle is here for? What's it trying to achieve? How would someone use it? Is it part of a bigger test thing I'm not aware of? Curious, xoxo, Andy

Headerizer docs

2007-07-03 Thread andy
/) /* PURE, WARN_UNUSED */ { return hash->entries; This function is a pure function because it only looks at its parameters or global memory. The interpreter doesn't get used, but needs to be passed because all PARROT_API functions have interpreters passed, so is flagged as a SHIM_INTERP. Comments? xoxo, Andy

About the headerizer

2007-07-04 Thread andy
Hello, this is a page from the workspace that I wanted you to see. This page is also available for viewing or editing on the web at: http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot/index.cgi?headerizer Headerizer creates function declarations based on function definitions. It scans the source files passed t

[PATCH] Remove the code that optionally gets a file to print to. We always want to print to STDOUT.

2009-04-22 Thread andy
From: Andy Lester --- build/gen_metaop_pir.pl | 13 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/build/gen_metaop_pir.pl b/build/gen_metaop_pir.pl index 78e4fce..9af1746 100644 --- a/build/gen_metaop_pir.pl +++ b/build/gen_metaop_pir.pl @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ #!/usr

[PATCH] Remove the code that can optionally generate to a filename. We only use stdout.

2009-04-22 Thread andy
From: Andy Lester --- build/Makefile.in |6 +++--- build/gen_junction_pir.pl | 12 +++- build/gen_uprop_pir.pl| 13 - build/gen_whatever_pir.pl | 12 +++- 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/build/Makefile.in b/build

Re: RFC 208 (v2) crypt() default salt

2000-09-21 Thread Andy Dougherty
ountered a case where I wanted to maintain the same rand() sequence and also use a one-arg crypt(). > I will add a note aboput this to the RFC. If there are no other > comments, I will freeze it in 24 hours. I agree this is a non-issue for this RFC.[*] -- Andy Dougherty

Re: Expunge "use English" from Perl? (was Re: Perl6Storm: Intent toRFC #0101)

2000-09-28 Thread Andy Dougherty
. I think it's a nice little bit of optional sugar and I don't see any reason to throw it away. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: Critique available

2000-11-02 Thread Andy Dougherty
r would also seem like a nice idea, but somebody'd have to write it :-). -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and documentation

2000-11-15 Thread Andy Dougherty
have Dan spend his time and talent trying to specify the api for perl extensions than trying to specify the api for perl development groups. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: Backtracking through the source

2000-11-30 Thread Andy Dougherty
ns, observations, > answers) - to the same? *That's* elitist. Fair enough to a point, but please let's not overburden the experienced folk by also _expecting_ them to always supply "corrections, observations, and answers". -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: RFC 99 (v3) Standardize ALL Perl platforms on UNIX epoch

2000-09-15 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Chris Nandor wrote: > You can only avoid breakage with current scripts if you make no changes to > the current facilities (which is what Andy proposed). Well I have to admit that I was unaware that on Mac and VMS (without the wizardry in vms/vms.c) the value retur

Re: Now, to try again...

2000-12-17 Thread Andy Dougherty
. Another route to keep in mind is spending effort working on and with things such as perl-byacc (and maybe even the yet-to-be-written perl-lex) that help turn simple "languages" into perl. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: Now, to try again...

2000-12-18 Thread Andy Dougherty
me problems, it's certainly too complex. For others it might not be. Not all problems need be shoe-horned into the same solution box. That's all I'm trying to say. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: Now, to try again...

2000-12-18 Thread Andy Dougherty
then it can probably be coerced into parsing something much simpler. So let's get on with the Perl6 parser. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: Now, to try again...

2000-12-19 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, David Grove wrote: > > Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The issues of 'use Python' or 'use Pythonish' are a quite different > issue. > > I don't think anyone believes it ought to be easy to *write

Re: standard representations

2000-12-28 Thread Andy Dougherty
bits. Some Crays simply don't have native 32-bit types. All integral types are 64 bits. So we can provide something called "I32" but we can't guarantee it's 32 bits. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: standard representations

2000-12-28 Thread Andy Dougherty
ter how you do it. You must have a clear mapping between the types used in the library (e.g. int or void * or some POSIXy_t thingy) and the types used internally in Perl (e.g. IV). Currently we get away with being sloppy since I32 is almost always the same as int. -- Andy Dougherty

Re: standard representations

2000-12-30 Thread Andy Dougherty
ently about a GNU one (presumably GPL > only). There's a clone of the GPL one that was written specifically to avoid GPL issues. I'll try to dig up more references when I'm in next week. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: standard representations

2001-01-02 Thread Andy Dougherty
n perhaps we should put the PDP-11 memory model probes back into Configure? :-) -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: standard representations

2001-01-02 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Andy Dougherty wrote: > > >Anyone know of a good bigint/bigfloat library whose terms are such that we > > >can just snag the source and use it in perl? > There's a clone of the GPL one that was written specifically to avoid GPL > issues. I

Re: cross-compiling

2001-01-03 Thread Andy Dougherty
t, but Jarkko and I are already on the -internals list and nothing's happening on the -build list anyway. Making it easier to cross-compile is one of Jarkko's long-standing goals, and he's done work on it here and there even in the Perl5 context. -- Andy Dougherty

Re: standard representations

2001-01-05 Thread Andy Dougherty
that instead. This is effectively what we do with sdbm/[gno]dbm/db. It is also possibily a possibility with gmp, since there's the public domain fgmp partial re-implementation (as well as the existing perl5 pure perl package). -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. o

Re: licensing issues

2001-01-08 Thread Andy Dougherty
out gmp, while also making it possible to link with gmp if a user wants the improved performance. (This is similar to what we do with AnyDBM_File in perl5 -- it's easy to add in Berkeley DB, but not required. Perl5 comes with sdbm.) -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM?

2001-01-31 Thread Andy Dougherty
it -- there's not really much to discuss. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM?

2001-01-31 Thread Andy Dougherty
s for my previous reports on the subject. For example, removing time() from the perl5 core means excising the following from pp_sys.c: PP(pp_time) { djSP; dTARGET; XPUSHi( time(Null(Time_t*)) ); RETURN; } and replacing it by the appropriate auto-loading glue. This

Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM?

2001-02-01 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Simon Cozens wrote: > God gave man two ears and one tongue so that we listen twice as much as > we speak. > -- Arab proverb ...but alas on the net we have 10 fingers to type but only 2 eyes to read. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL

Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...)

2001-02-10 Thread Andy Dougherty
. Zip uses the same compress method as gzip. In fact gzip's author, Jean-loup Gailly, is also a prominent contributor to InfoZip -- the group behind Zip and Unzip. I don't see any licensing advantage to gzip over zip or vice-versa. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...)

2001-02-13 Thread Andy Dougherty
simultaneous installation of multiple versions of modules. (I don't recall the relevant RFC offhand, but I think there's was also a similar idea in Larry's Atlanta speech.) -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: Generating Perl 6 source with Perl

2001-02-16 Thread Andy Dougherty
ing and allow us to postpone worrying about Configure's replacement. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: Auto-install (was autoloaded...)

2001-02-16 Thread Andy Dougherty
agreeable. There already is a perl6-build list. Perhaps you can just use that? -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: PDD 4: Internal data types

2001-03-02 Thread Andy Dougherty
rl > configuration time. The C-level typedef C and C get you a > platform-native signed and unsigned integer respectively. So presumably PERL_INT could be "long long" but IV might just be "long". Hmm. So how do you carry around a PERL_INT inside the perl6 source? --

Re: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types

2001-03-02 Thread Andy Dougherty
ed to deal with integers in an abstract way, > you'll use a variable of type INT. That way if you get handed an IV or a > bigint pointer, both will fit fine. Ah. I misread that too. You may safely ignore my question about INT as "long long" then. -- Andy Dougherty

Re: PDD 4 internal data types, version 1.1

2001-03-30 Thread Andy Dougherty
x27;s as a data format? It won't work for sqrt(2) > or PI, but it can easily store 1/3 as two (long) integers. The internal details ought to be invisible. Anyway, since you still can't store any irrationals exactly, you still have the same issues of rounding and precision. --

Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1

2001-04-06 Thread Andy Dougherty
recisely. I often have one-liners embedded in larger shell scripts. Most of those survived the perl4->perl5 transition intact. I'd hope the same can be said for the perl5->perl6 transition. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1

2001-04-09 Thread Andy Dougherty
and breaking compatibility. Perl6 is likely to continue in that tradition. Let's leave -e alone for now and worry about handling specific incompatibilities when we in fact have some specific incompatibilities to worry about. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physic

Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1

2001-04-09 Thread Andy Dougherty
e need a way to tell it that it isn't. perl -M6 -e ... -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc

2001-04-11 Thread Andy Dougherty
at's a change from perl5 practice, but probably a good one. It's worth noting explicitly in the appropriate PDD. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc

2001-04-11 Thread Andy Dougherty
l those defines #include "myprogram.h" #include #include Of course _that_ could still collide with a #define for str_to_UTF() in myprogram.h, though this is starting to get less likely. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1

2001-04-12 Thread Andy Dougherty
e flag would be a good choice in that it's very human-readable. More readable than the already-supporrted -M7 ? Do we *really* need a new command-line option that is one character shorter than an existing command-line option that can do exactly the same thing? -- Andy Dougherty

Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1

2001-04-15 Thread Andy Dougherty
ace to make such charges. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

RE: So, we need a code name...

2001-04-24 Thread Andy Dougherty
s > always a big plus. Starting with 'P' is useful so we can keep our acronyms such as PMC and PDD :-). It's just an internal code name, so it probably doesn't matter if it's taken for another purpose. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: Tying & Overloading

2001-04-25 Thread Andy Dougherty
yet to see what changes might be in store for how, when, and why we'll be using method calls in perl6 vs. perl5. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: Configurators!

2001-08-30 Thread Andy Dougherty
nd endianness come to mind makes me wonder how feasible that hope is. Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: reconfiguring configure

2005-11-14 Thread Andy Dougherty
. However, note that this Makefile is for the maintainer's use only. The Configure maintainer runs metaconfig which sorts all this stuff out, and then ships the finished Configure file, which has all the steps in the right order. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RT Permissions

2005-12-02 Thread Andy Lester
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:10:24PM -0800, Ovid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I've wondered about this myself. I've taken over Class::Trait but I > can't take ownership of the RT requests. RT should do it automagically. Email Jesse directly if not. xoxo, Andy -- Andy Leste

Re: RT Permissions

2005-12-02 Thread Andy Lester
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 03:19:42PM -0500, Christopher H. Laco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > For which, first-come, or do all of the co-maints have full RT access as > well? I don't know. -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: [perl #37819] Sun4 builds fail linking against jit.o

2005-12-05 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote: > > On Dec 2, 2005, at 19:59, Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote: > > > Parrot_jit_emit_mov_mr_offs blib/lib/libparrot.a(jit.o) > > Parrot_jit_emit_get_base_reg_no blib/lib/libparrot.a(jit.o) > > Parrot_jit_em

Re: [perl #37819] Sun4 builds fail linking against jit.o

2005-12-06 Thread Andy Dougherty
Leo> Can you provide dummy subs for the _offs functions and put in a dummy Leo> define for the get_base_reg_no macro that returns some valid register Leo> number. Andy> I'll try something, but it'll be nearly blind guessing -- I don't know Andy> anywhere near e

Re: some goals for the next release

2005-12-06 Thread Andy Dougherty
t'd be nice to just run Configure.pl --generate (or some such) and have it regenerate the generated files without having to go through and re-run all of the Configure.pl tests. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Introduction

2005-12-16 Thread Andy Lester
en you'll tell me what project you want set up. Let us know how it goes! We're glad to have you join us. xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: $Ignore_Exitcode in Test-Harness

2005-12-25 Thread Andy Lester
iable nor the variable that has > been > assigned from it are referenced. Is it because this functionality was removed > or because these lines were accidently removed? In any case, it should be > fixed. I've pulled it out. Thanks. xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: The --perl switch [was Re: $Ignore_Exitcode in Test-Harness]

2005-12-25 Thread Andy Lester
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 10:49:28PM +0200, Shlomi Fish ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > However prove does not have a "--perl" switch: Fixed in Test::Harness 2.57_01. Thanks. xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: The --perl switch [was Re: $Ignore_Exitcode in Test-Harness]

2005-12-29 Thread Andy Lester
ot; ); -my $tests = File::Spec->catfile( 't', 'prove*.t' ); +$prove = "$^X $prove"; GLOBBAGE: { my @actual = sort qx/$prove --dry $tests/; -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: [perl #38141] [PATCH] CFLAGS missed two files in src/ reorganization

2006-01-04 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote: > Andy, > > Were you caught by either "takes too long" or "Overwhelms some > compilers."? Well, it hadn't quite overwhelmed the compiler yet -- it was swapping like mad for at least 20 minutes and still

Re: [perl #38141] [PATCH] CFLAGS missed two files in src/ reorganization

2006-01-04 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, jerry gay via RT wrote: > On 1/4/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote: > > > I'm wondering if it's worth disabling optimizations for > > > those compilati

Re: Heureka - from the -Ofun department

2006-02-10 Thread Andy Dougherty
c -C ../tmp/ack.pir 11 Ack(3, 11) = 16381 real1m1.211s user1m1.087s sys 0m0.021s Something's obviously very goofy there, but I don't know what. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #38406] [BUG] PGE - truncating PIR code generated by p6rule

2006-02-10 Thread Andy Dougherty
t/past.t6 1536 76 85.71% 2-7 t/past_op.t 2 512 22 100.00% 1-2 t/past_val.t2 512 22 100.00% 1-2 t/post.t2 512 32 66.67% 2-3 t/post_op.t 2 512 22 100.00% 1-2 t/post_val.t2 512 22 100.00% 1-2 *** Error code 2 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `test' -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #38406] [BUG] PGE - truncating PIR code generated by p6rule

2006-02-13 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Allison Randal wrote: > On Feb 10, 2006, at 9:56, Andy Dougherty via RT wrote: > > > > I too had seen this memory problem before on Solaris/SPARC, but I'm > > pretty sure I saw it even when running t/past_node_5.pir directly. > > However,

Re: svn access (was: [perl #38576] [PATCH] Make DETAIL_MEMORY_DEBUG work. )

2006-02-16 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote: > Andy, I've already asked once: don't you have svn access? If no (and if > you want it) please mail me your auth.perl.org account data, to get you > svn priv bits. I do have priv bits, and have on rare occasion used them, b

Re: [perl #18189] Test failures with 'long long' on i386/linux

2006-02-16 Thread Andy Dougherty
11 100.00% 1 t/src/io.t 2 512202 10.00% 4 7 Failed 64/228 test scripts, 71.93% okay. 1249/4846 subtests failed, 74.23% okay. 9 tests and 728 subtests skipped. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #38577] [PATCH] Reduce memory consumption of t/pmc/resizablebooleanarray_17.pasm

2006-02-16 Thread Andy Dougherty
eanarray is taking 64 bytes to store 1 bit of information. When Jerry applied that patch, he agreed that was odd and decided to leave the ticket open pending further investigation. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #18189] Test failures with 'long long' on i386/linux

2006-02-16 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote: > > On Feb 16, 2006, at 17:34, Andy Dougherty wrote: > > > > >> This bug seems to have resolved itself at least on amd64/linux. > >> Please > >> re-open this bug if it's still failing for you. T

Re: svn performance

2006-02-17 Thread Andy Dougherty
... Sigh. I wish it were that simple, or that funny. $ time wget http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot-latest.tar.gz real0m16.84s user0m0.09s sys 0m0.20s $ time svn co http://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk parrot-trunk real 2:01:50.3 user 1:02.0 sys44.9 It's something specific to svn. No, I don't know what. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: svn performance

2006-02-17 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Matt Fowles wrote: > > On 2/17/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sigh. I wish it were that simple, or that funny. > > > > $ time wget http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot-latest.tar.gz > > > > real0m16.8

Re: svn performance

2006-02-17 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, jesse wrote: > > > On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Matt Fowles wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2/17/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > $ time wget http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot-latest.tar.gz > > >

Re: [perl #38584] [BUG] Punie test failures in set_node method on Solaris/SPARC

2006-02-27 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Allison Randal via RT wrote: > > It looks like 'node.set_node' doesn't actually end up doing > > anything. > > Andy, could you try this again on the 0.4.2 release of Parrot? I cleaned > up the method declaration syntax just before the rel

Re: svn performance

2006-02-28 Thread Andy Dougherty
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 Andy Dougherty wrote: [svn co on Solaris 8 is painfully *slow*] > $ time wget http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot-latest.tar.gz > > real0m16.84s > user0m0.09s > sys 0m0.20s > > $ time svn co http://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk p

Re: [PATCH] Compiling Parrot on NetBSD

2006-03-02 Thread Andy Dougherty
ve all the various *BSD distributions drifted apart far enough that it makes sense to maintain completely independent hints and platform directories for each? -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: svn performance

2006-03-22 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > On Feb 28, 2006, at 19:27, Andy Dougherty wrote: > > > > > Executive summary -- svn co on Solaris 8 is still *slow*! I"ll stick > > to fetching snapshots with wget. > > Dumb question? Why 'svn co'

Re: Perl 6 on Solaris 10 anyone ?

2006-03-28 Thread Andy Dougherty
ome additional libraries first. (See the ghc download page for details.) Last time I checked, not all those libraries built for me on Solaris 8, so I was never able to get ghc (and hence pugs) up and running. You may have better luck on Solaris 10, or the libraries may have been fixed since t

[PATCH] My first patch, for builtins.*

2006-04-02 Thread Andy Lester
s do their jobs. Here's my first patch. Let me know if y'all see this sort of work as useful, or if I shouldn't bother. xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance Index: src/builtin.c ==

Re: [PATCH] My first patch, for builtins.*

2006-04-06 Thread Andy Lester
e there? I think I'd prefer to see a whole list. -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: Duplicated code

2006-04-08 Thread Andy Lester
ntionally dupes of each other? For example, there's jit_cpu.c and exec_cpu.c, and apparently are exact clones of each other. xoa -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: Duplicated code

2006-04-08 Thread Andy Lester
e? Or, maybe better for > me, how do I discern what you discerned? (I wanna discern!!) Look at the tops of the files that have dupes. A couple that I looked at have "Generated by xxx/xxx/xxx.pl" at the top. -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: [PATCH] Duplicated code

2006-04-08 Thread Andy Lester
Can you do it without the autogenerated files in there? Those, I expect to have duplicated code. -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Non-Perl TAP implementations

2006-04-16 Thread Andy Lester
I'm adding a section to Test::Harness::TAP on non-Perl TAP. http://svn.perl.org/modules/Test-Harness/trunk/lib/Test/Harness/TAP.pod If you know of one, please send me some text to add. Thanks, xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: Non-Perl TAP implementations

2006-04-17 Thread Andy Lester
who has no idea how/why you'd use TAP outside of Perl? -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: Non-Perl TAP implementations

2006-04-17 Thread Andy Lester
How non-Perl do you want? Does the Perl 6 version of Test.pm or Test::Builder/Test::More count? How about the Parrot versions? Sure, lemme have 'em. -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

prove users: Please test P/PE/PETDANCE/Test-Harness-2.57_04.tar.gz

2006-04-17 Thread Andy Lester
I'm about to release T::H 2.58, but I have a pretty big difference in how globbing is done in prove, per Audrey. Please download and try it out on your box and make sure it's all good. Thanks! xoox, Andy Begin forwarded message: From: PAUSE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: April

Re: prove users: Please test P/PE/PETDANCE/Test-Harness-2.57_04.tar.gz

2006-04-17 Thread Andy Lester
On Apr 17, 2006, at 8:14 PM, James E Keenan wrote: Here is a portion of the output of 'prove -vb t/test-harness.t'. Is it what you would expect? The big thing that's a question is in globbing of files on the command line. -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] =

Re: Non-Perl TAP implementations

2006-04-17 Thread Andy Lester
r own grammars and thus structure the output to better suit their needs. Patches less welcome! :-) -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: TODO tests

2006-04-18 Thread Andy Lester
assed and reported on them. Maybe this would be worthy of a Summer of Code project, or it may actually be something much easier and basic that a normal grant would work for this. At least put it in the queue... xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: TODO tests and test::harness

2006-04-18 Thread Andy Lester
BTW, the patch only shows TODO pass status when no failures occur. Oh and obviously all of Test::Harness'es tests pass. :-) This patch doesn't apply against my latest dev version of Test::Harness. I'm going to have to massage it manually. But I like the idea. Thanks.

Test::Harness now tells you which TODOs passed unexpectedly

2006-04-18 Thread Andy Lester
quest entered by: PETDANCE (Andy Lester) Request entered on: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 05:33:58 GMT Request completed: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 05:50:05 GMT Thanks, -- paused, v460 -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: [perl #38957] hash test failures

2006-04-21 Thread Andy Dougherty
(Solaris 8/SPARC) for quite a long time (since last summer at least, I think). I tried to see if it's still there in the current code, but my build & test script aborted at the Configure.pl stage (due to the changed perl version requirements). -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

What version of perl is required?

2006-04-21 Thread Andy Dougherty
e 243. I have no strong opinion on which version to use, but the two files ought to agree. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: What version of perl is required?

2006-04-21 Thread Andy Dougherty
ed anywhere? -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Test me please: P/PE/PETDANCE/Test-Harness-2.57_06.tar.gz

2006-04-23 Thread Andy Lester
6.tar.gz size: 69114 bytes md5: 41efc0985146e4f7d678ec7cb9b59047 -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: Test me please: P/PE/PETDANCE/Test-Harness-2.57_06.tar.gz

2006-04-23 Thread Andy Lester
$VERSION. I'm sorry, I didn't mean for anyone to bother going to this trouble. I've always known what it was. It'll go away in the next version. -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

[PATCH] Re: What version of perl is required?

2006-04-24 Thread Andy Dougherty
e, I have no strong opinion on which version to use, but the main parrot README certainly ought to reflect reality. diff -r -u parrot-current/lib/Parrot/Distribution.pm parrot-andy/lib/Parrot/Distribution.pm --- parrot-current/lib/Parrot/Distribution.pm Tue Mar 14 19:15:06 2006 +++ parrot-andy/

Re: [perl #38978] [PATCH] Fix unitialized register error in t/pmc/file.t

2006-04-26 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote: > On Apr 25, 2006, at 17:34, Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote: > > > Previously, I expect the only reason it was passing for some folks is > > that > > unused I registers are somehow automatically set to 0 on Linux/x86

Re: [perl #38957] hash test failures

2006-04-27 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Andy Dougherty wrote: > On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Will Coleda wrote: > > > OSX 10.4.6, PPC > > > > This failure has been pretty persistent the past few weeks: > > > > t/src/hash.t1 256111 9.09% 6 > > > >

Re: MSWin32 (Visual C++ 8.0) Test Results (r12442)

2006-04-27 Thread Andy Dougherty
uers" anywhere obvious? I don't see it anywhere obvious either in the source or in the recent perl6-internals archives. Perhaps I've missed it somewhere. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hundreds of errors?

2006-04-28 Thread Andy Dougherty
strings" => Null PMC access in get_integer() 2got: '"hash1" => Null PMC access in get_integer() 1got: '"hash" => Null PMC access in get_integer() 1got: '"array of various strings" => Null P

Re: Hundreds of errors?

2006-04-28 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:02:53AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: > > Something's gone horribly wrong after the recent PGE check-in. I don't > > actually think it's in PGE, just that the new PGE is triggering som

tags

2006-05-05 Thread Andy Lester
I made the Makefile's handling of ctags a lot smarter, so that the tag refers to the .pmc file, instead of the .c file, for example. And I put the tags file in Subversion. xoxo, Andy On May 5, 2006, at 9:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: petdance Date: Fri May 5 19:40:55 200

Re: W3C validator

2006-05-08 Thread Andy Lester
s based on libtidy. -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: W3C validator

2006-05-08 Thread Andy Lester
On May 8, 2006, at 11:20 AM, A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-08 18:00]: Try my HTML::Tidy. It's based on libtidy. Speaking of which, any chance that’ll get a somewhat usable interface? Right now, parser options have to be written to a file and t

Unintended consequences

2006-05-22 Thread Andy Lester
Here's an example of why I'm not real excited about CPANTS: http://community.livejournal.com/perl/120747.html xoa -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: CPANTS is not a game.

2006-05-23 Thread Andy Lester
that we're playing for different goals. Schwern was saying that the improvement of the modules is a game. PerlGirl is making a game out of improving the numeric score for her modules, but without any improvement of the module itself. -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.p

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >