Just some brief comments... $0.02 or some such. :)
-R
Quoting Dave Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> =item *
>
> "K&R" style for indenting control constructs: ie the closing C<}>
> should
> line up with the opening C etc.
You should provide a short example here - K&R has lots of nasties, you
>>How about something a little more explicit than XXX, like TODO or FIXME?
> Some syntax-highlighting editors highlight "XXX". Let's use that feature.
Which ones? emacs doesn't seem to do it by default.
> And how can you get more explicit than XXX, anyway?
Funny, but I still think TODO or
> ... seems to be dead for about a day now, though I know commits are
> going through.
Fixed.
> BCCing webmaster at perl dot org, where this will hopefully open a
> ticket.
THANK YOU. This meant the message got seen much earlier than it
otherwise would, and because of the BCC, no collateral dam
> snapshots or releases. And, since a checkout takes about an hour (last
> time I checked) I tend to be too lazy to fetch one just to make a patch.
Only if you're checking out to a Commodore 64.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp$ time svn co http://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk
parrot-trunk > /dev/null
re
> Sigh. I wish it were that simple, or that funny.
>
> $ time wget http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot-latest.tar.gz
>
> real0m16.84s
> user0m0.09s
> sys 0m0.20s
>
> $ time svn co http://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk parrot-trunk
>
> real 2:01:50.3
> user 1:02.0
> sys
FYI -
At some point later this week, or maybe this weekend, I will be taking
the perl.org Subversion server down to move it to different hardware.
This most likely won't happen until after the imminent Parrot release.
>From an end user perspective, nothing should change. (Although we are
upgra
Upgrade complete. You shouldn't notice anything different, except
some operations might be faster.
-R
At Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:25:22 -0800,
Robert Spier wrote:
>
>
> FYI -
>
> At some point later this week, or maybe this weekend, I will be taking
> the perl.org Su
> Applied in 11755, 11756, and 11758. (Ticket not closed; I don't have
> permission.)
You shouldn't say things like that. You have permission now.
-R (pulling an Audrey.)
> > (If so, as a bit of background it's discussed at the bottom of #38217
> > on RT, and I tried to put together a patch in r11320 but I caused some
> > breakage so it's been backed out. I need to revive it)
>
> Thank you, Nick. How do I get a username and password for RT?
http://auth.perl.org/
> Given the recent explosion of svn commits in the synopses, and the fact that
> the versions of the synopses on the dev.perl.org/perl6 site are lagging a
> bit, would it make sense to add a link to the svn site to the
> Synopses page?
I'd rather not.
The ones on the dev site shouldn't have be
> I was going to suggest keeping an archive of this one outside the
> repository, but it's only 2 files, so I'll just keep a copy for
> myself. (I'd like to revive it at some point in PGE/TGE and the old
> implementation could be useful.)
Nothing is actually _deleted_ from SVN... it just gets har
Finally, the moment you've all been waiting for is here!
perlbug (http://rt.perl.org/rt3/) has been upgraded to the latest and
greatest version (RT 3.6).
Here are some changes you might notice:
- a new shiny look
- no more auth.perl.org, we now authenticate directly from bitcard.org
- a p
>#define PARROT_str_local(d)\
> STRING * d = NULL; \
> frame frame_##d;\
> int dummy_##d = ( \
> (frame_##d.ptr = &d), \
> (frame_##d.next = stack_top), \
> (stack_top = &frame_##d), \
>
>What are the debugging issues you mention? Note that this macro will
>never fail: there is no pointer deferencing, no memory allocation, ...
Never is a bad word to use for anything more complicated than x=1+2.
(Which will hopefully get constant folded and optimized away anyway.)
It is impossib
Apologies for this test, I'm tracking down reports that attachements
aren't getting through the list and getting to the bugtracker.
-R
Apologies again for this test, I'm tracking down reports that
attachements aren't getting through the list and getting to the
bugtracker.
It helps if I actually attach the temp file.
temp
Description: Binary data
>Has the CVSROOT changed ?
Last November. :)
>>cvs checkout parrot
>
>/home/perlcvs: no such repository
>cvs checkout: authorization failed: server cvs.perl.org rejected access to
>/home/perlcvs for user anonymous
Use /cvs/public
-R
Thanks, Applied.
Clinton A. Pierce writes:
>Fixes the problem where the toplevel makefile can't descend into lib/Parrot
>to do the build necessary for PackFile and friends. Also I think the
>single cd .. may potentially be a bug for other platforms as well.
>
>Apply this and re-run Configure.
--- start of forwarded message ---
Date: 7 Jun 2002 21:36:26 -
From: Joe Yates (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Subject: Re: [netlabs #590] Ticket Resolved
Message-Id:
Dear Daniel,
I hope I'm not being a pain. The response to my report was that "This'll
I've updated http://www.parrotcode.org/todo with the latest info from
Dan.
Dan Sugalski writes:
>Here's the list 'o stuff I'd like to get done for August:
>
>*) Multiple interpreters with inter-interpreter calling done right
>*) Threads with multiple independent interpreters
>*) Method calls
>*
There's enough words and definitions going by that not everyone
understands that it's time for us to have a glossary.
I'm willing to do the administrative work of maintaining it, if others
send me entries.
So... if there are words you think should be in the parrot glossary
(the recent discussio
The glossary in cvs docs/glossary.pod is now available on the web:
http://www.parrotcode.org/glossary
We need more tests.
According to..
http://www.hitchhiker.org/parrot_coverage/
only 33% of the lines are covered!
if something breaks in the other 67%, we'll never know, unless we have
tests.
-R
--
H.Merijn Brand writes:
>http://www.perl.org/perl6 is a bit behind. Anyone care to update and include
>apo-5? And Damian's tour info.
I've added Apoc 5.
Patches for tour info welcome.
-R
>Perhaps it got mangled? Can you send it to me as an attachment?
Attachments can also be sent to the tracker. They're handled better
now.
-R
Since we've had a few new faces around here recently, I thought it
would be a good time to remind people about www.parrotcode.org, and
specifically the Development Resources page.
http://www.parrotcode.org/resources
It looks a lot like this, but with links of course...
* Perl 6/Parrot Mail
Chip Salzenberg writes:
>Ouch. I gather, then, that nntp.perl.org does not house complete list
>archives, or else the discussion was not on p6-language ... ?
It should have complete archives. It uses the same backend data as
the html version on archive.develooper.com.
Dan Sugalski writes:
>At 12:01 PM -0400 7/12/02, Melvin Smith wrote:
>>Did you check docs/ and docs/pdds first? There may already be something
>>there. The glossary is probably a good idea anyway.
>
>I added some definitions to glossary. I think the changes'll be
>picked up on parrotcode.org arou
>I've heard reports of rsync not working. I don't use it, so I dunno
>there. If someone's got the proper incantation, or follows the
>directions and it doesn't work (when you're *sure* you know what
>you're doing) I'll update it appropriately.
Yes, this seems broken at the moment. I've opene
>Correct, I don't maintain the site, but I believe Robert has said he would
>accept patches.
Yes, if people send me updates/diff/new content's, or just "replace
this paragraph with this", I'll do the merges.
-R
Brent Dax writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
># Good stuff. Didn't you also send out a draft PDD about how
># types should
># be named and managed in parrot at one point? I, for one,
>
>At one point I sent out a patch to PDD7 that handled type naming.
(I don't know what happened to this specific pa
In my never-ending crusade to try and keep the bug system from passing
on lots of spam, some messages have been falsely flagged as spam.
Please look at tickets 15748 and 15877.
We've done a bunch of tweaking tonight, so hopefully the falsepos
count will drop and falseneg count will go up. In g
John Porter writes:
>
>Aldo Calpini wrote:
>> this is a little tutorial about submitting patches
>> (should be added to a FAQ, or somewhere where it's handy
>
>I think this deserves its own page somewhere on
>dev.perl.org.
Seems like a good idea. I've added it to the queue. It'll end up on
parr
>On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 08:44:20AM -0700, Stephen Rawls wrote:
>> The last two (well, the only two :) patches I sent
>> were counted as spam. Some of the points were becuase
Sorry about that! I'm trying to be better safe than sorry in
preventing spam from getting to the list.
>> Do the patche
>I don't like spam. Thanks for keeping it out.
I try. :)
>How do you recruit new "someone"s?
I head down to the local mall and hold up a big sign.
>Are they the same sort of "someone"s who manage perl5 bugs?
Yup.
(Or just anyone silly enough to volunteer.)
>And (IIRC) Spam Assassin is th
Bryan C. Warnock writes:
>How does one patch a file to delete?
>
>docs/a5_draft.html can go away now, thank you for playing.
rm
cvs delete
cvs commit
Bryan C. Warnock writes:
>There is a general inconsistency about file permissions throughout the
>parrot tree.
>
>Of the 80+ *.pl scripts, only 8 are 0755 - and Configure.pl isn't one of
>them. Some tests are, some aren't; and even some docs are. A list
>follows.
These have to be fixed in the re
>Ok then, [perl #16934] is unvalid, it should be removed from rt unless
>we want its syntax as an alternative to the correct way.
The removal process looks like:
set patch status to "Rejected" (and make sure to send an email
with a reason)
Change ticket state to resolved.
-R
>> xScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has blocked a file xattachment(s).
>is getting trying. Do we have any official public LARTing policy on
>braindead systems that mail back to the list?
There are too many to properly LART. When I see them, I add them to
the Spam filters. Right now we've got 1
http://www.parrotcode.org/openpatches
There are a _lot_ of Pending patches.
Within a few weeks, I hope to have an automated email nudging about
this weekly.
-R
(801) [PATCH] PerlArray in scalar context Pending
(15345) [PATCH] Generating assemble.pl Pending
(15574) [PATCH] RECALL renamed to
> Here's a couple more that I just stumbled across - they've not been
> picked up automatically because they don't have [PATCH] in the header.
> (16077) 'assign' opcode and unmorphing
> (16098) First draft of PerlScalar PMC
I've tagged them both as patches, so they'll show up in the list now.
-R
George (via RT) writes:
># New Ticket Created by George
># Please include the string: [perl #17733]
># in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
># http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17733 >
Grumble. This guy sent this to the wrong email address. I've boun
>Well here it is, my first attempt at a "getting started" guide. It's
>not ready for public consumption, but I would like to hear some
When this stabilizes, we can make it available on www.parrotcode.org
>I plan to have a lot more diagrams in the document. I am using 'dia'
>to create them. I
>2.) You mention getting a Perl distribution for Windows, but don't metnion
>getting a C compiler.
> I would recommend saying something about CygWin (www.cygwin.com) or
>perhaps a dos based C compiler. cvs, perl, and make all become non-issues
>when CygWin is added to the mix; although perfo
>I'll see about getting some of the internal structures diagrammed
>better, which is the only place things are a little dodgy, but that's
>otherwise fine.
Simon Wistow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dropped me an email and reminded
me about AutoDia http://droogs.org/autodia/
>Now, here's hoping CVS doesn't
>>So the html is canonical and you're converting it to pod? I'm
>> confused.
>I am writing it in my own format. It lets me take notes, write todo
>lists, autogenerate the table of contents and glossary. Then I run it
>through some perl that currently spits out html and almost make pod.
Whatev
>4)How do I get pod2html to give me html that looks like the docs on
>http://www.parrotcode.org/docs/?
Ha! :)
We're using a slightly tweaked (by Graham Barr for search.cpan.org)
version of POD::POM and a stylesheet.
You can find the stylesheet here:
http://dev.perl.org/perl-styles.css
Onc
Steve Fink writes:
>> >I don't know exactly who has the permissions to do these things, but
>> >I'm pretty sure that if you have commit access then you also have RT
>> >futzing access.
^^^ this isn't true. The permissions are seperate (but obviously
should be related.)
-R
>I just wanted to obsolete this Patch, because the missing files now
>have entered the MANIFEST. But bugs6.perl.org only tells me "Permission
>denied". Im logged in, and the bugtracker recognizes this patch as
>mine.
I've tweaked the permissions, try again.
-R
Obviously spam, sorry folks.
It snuck in under the spam filters.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.3 required=7.0
tests=CARRIAGE_RETURNS,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,MISSING_HEADERS,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,TO_EMPTY
version=2.41
-R (pondering his next move in the unending war against spa
I've upgraded the experimental perl.org cvsmonitor implementation.
It's very cool. Take a peek:
http://rt.perl.org/cgi-bin/cvsmonitor/cvsmonitor.pl?cmd=viewModule&module=perl_public.parrot
-or-
http://snipurl.com/9hn
It gets updated once a day, around 3 AM Pacific time, AKA 6 AM Eastern
Time
>Ah... that would explain why I haven't seen it then. Looks like
>someone broke perl6-all.
No, it was just "not configured".
Future messages to perl6-documentation should end up on perl6-all.
-R
chromatic writes:
>I've submitted three bugs for Perl 6 to [EMAIL PROTECTED] They're in
>RT, but they haven't been announced on this group. I believe Allison
>has asked Ask to look into this.
Well, since I'm the RT owner, you and she should have asked me, or
even better, the bugs6-admin at perl.
> The list server keeps eating my attached homework. Won't let me attach a
> .t file.
This is because your mailer is declaring it to be an
application/x-troff file.
Updated. (Sorry for the delay.)
-R
At Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:18:38 +0100,
Roger Browne wrote:
>
> By the way, the website
> http://www.parrotcode.org/
> still refers to 0.2.0 as the latest version.
>
> Regards,
> Roger Browne
Thanks, applied.
At Thu, 21 Jul 2005 01:39:42 +0800,
Autrijus Tang wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> Below is a patch to remove the first Q&A from:
> http://dev.perl.org/perl6/faq.html
> [1 ]
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 11:53:01AM -0700, Robert Spier wrote:
> > Thanks, applied.
> Thanks! However, the rendered form is still of an old revision:
> http://dev.perl.org/perl6/faq.html
It was still in my staging copy. It should be up now.
-R
We've actually done a merge. It is complete. All committed changes
on the leo-ctx5 branch are now on trunk as of rev 9260. The leo-ctx5
branch was deleted as rev 9261.
If you have any checkouts of the leo-ctx5 branch, you will need to
switch them to trunk
cd parrot-checkout-of-leo-ctx5-br
> No, it isn't. =)
>
> The mail list strips out .t attachments (Robert? is this necessary?)
We don't strip .t We strip troff attachments. Really, it's a bad
mailer that is labeling the .t file a troff mime-type.
I've removed the troff types from the bad mime list.
-R
Nicholas Clark writes:
>On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 06:22:56PM +0100, Jerome Quelin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Would it be possible to rename the $PARROT/languages/Befunge-93
>> directory into $PARROT/languages/befunge ?
>> Indeed, as soon as parrot will support objects, I'll implement the
>> befunge 98
>Would it also be your job to do porting of subversion to VMS, so that we
>could consider replacing CVS with something that lets clients do directory
>moves? :-)
Sadly, no. :)
But I can tell you that I am actively investigating the use of
subversion for future use on perl.org projects. We're st
I've renamed the brainfuck directory to bf, per Dan's request.
I _did not_ do the usual magic I do to keep both the old and new names
valid.
Thus - according to CVS, the brainfuck directory never existed, only
one called bf.
I updated the MANIFEST, but did not update anything else.
-R
--
>How about my original inclinaton: "perg"? It just screams out "the
>opposite of grep".
So it greps a list in reverse order?
-R (who does not see any benefit of 'perg' over grep { ! code } )
I've upgraded the CVS Monitor installation on perl.org
http://bugs6.perl.org/cgi-bin/cvsmonitor/cvsmonitor.pl?cmd=viewBrowse
It provides a pretty, changeset oriented view of the repositories,
with pretty graphs and stuff.
I recommend checking it out.
-R
--
>
>The checkout that rsync is returning must be getting stale.
Yeah.
Fixed.
-R
Obviously garbage. (And not related to perl6/parrot.) I've cleaned
it out of the tracker.
-R
"Vema, Venkata" (via RT) writes:
>
>g'day
> THANX IN ADVANCE
>
>**
>Btw - Is there any interest in having a GNU GLOBAL or LXR cross-referenced
>web copy of the parrot code?
Yes, definitely.
We could probably even put it on parrotcode.org or
dev.perl.org/perl6. Do you have a recommendation between GLOBAL and
LXR?
-R
>(I don't see an RT queue, so I'm sending this to the parrot queue)
There is one, but it's not visible to you. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
the shortest address to get there.
>I have a dev.perl.org account. my email is currently set to "will at
>coleda.com".
> > For proper tracking, you should send t
Mitchell N Charity wrote:
>Do you have a recommendation between GLOBAL and LXR?
> I'd suggest LXR. It understands perl files out-of-the-box, is more
I've asked one of our volunteers who already runs some similar systems
for us if he can get this running. If not, I'll see about setting you
(
At Tue, 07 Jan 2003 18:59:22 GMT,
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (via RT) wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> # Please include the string: [perl #19800]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=19800 >
Sme
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> $ ./getparrot
> can't create temporary directory /tmp/cvs-serv3864
> No space left on device
Oops.
Fixed.
-R
Odd.
There's not enough information in the logs to figure out what's going
on. (And the code shouldn't have this kind of failure mode.)
If it keeps happening, please keep me in the loop.
-R
At Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:00:21 +0100,
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Cannot open file /tmp/#cvs.lastdir.27414
> Please reply with the best time to send your cards to her, I am lost on this one
> -Eddie
Interesting. Obviously spam. I've dealt with it.
Interesting parts, for those who care:
X-Mailer: Mach5 Mailer-3.00 PID{5df70590-1abd-4223-8406-483160352ade}
RI{38ecd-ff200} Not Licensed for UCE, uce at
> Also I can't work out how to search the list archive at develooper.com.
Patches welcome.
(Really. I have several archive management tasks that need to get
done, and if anyone wants to volunteer)
-R
> Strange. I can ssh in, and apachectl claims that the webserver is running,
> but I'm getting that error too.
>
> Ask, Robert: any ideas?
Looks like the apache had hung somewhere. I shut it down and started
it up, and it seems ok.
-R
At Thu, 06 Feb 2003 13:47:45 +0100,
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> I don't know, why I can't update the MANIFEST, I got a fresh copy added
> CGP.pm and...
>
> $ cvs ci -mCGP MANIFEST
> cvs server: Up-to-date check failed for `MANIFEST'
> cvs [server aborted]: correct above errors first!
What does `cvs
> target some platform. Targeting parrot with either method would require
> access to an XML parser. Is there currently any way to get access to an
> XML parser from within parrot?
Not today, unless you write a PMC to interface to expat or
something
-R
> documentation--I'll get started on it ASAP so we can make the changes
> quickly and get this out of the way once and for all.
Famous Last Words!(tm)
-R
> If we can't find anothr home for it, I can make a spot on
> ftp.sidhe.org for it. Not a *fast* home, since it's either 128k or
> 192k upstream (depending on which interface is active, don't ask) but
> it will work.
Maybe when 0.10 is released, Clinton will do another windows build and
we can
Thanks, applied.
Cal Henderson wrote:
>
> attached below sig.
>
> --cal
> "just take a little look from our side when you can"
>
>
> --- index.html Wed Mar 19 08:10:15 2003
> +++ index.html.new Wed Mar 19 08:11:03 2003
> @@ -62,9 +62,9 @@
> How to get the code
>
> Periodic releas
Someone please stick this man's ditty into the examples directory :)
-R!
Douglas Hunter wrote:
>
> Thank you everyone for bringing this fun tool to such a useful state so
> quickly. The progress Parrot has shown is impressive. I offer you my
> thanks in probably not-so-elegantly written pas
> > mistral-jerome:/tmp > time python test.py
> > python test.py 2,59s user 0,00s system 100% cpu 2,582 total
> > mistral-jerome:/tmp > ocamlc -o tst test.ml; time ./tst
> > ./tst 0,14s user 0,00s system 106% cpu 0,131 total
> > mistral-jerome:/tmp > cat test.ml
> > let fo
Yep. Seems reasonable. The macros would improve readability IMHO
As long as they don't impair debugability.
(I make a reference to perl5's macros containing macros, which do
different things based on other macros, and other fun things. It's a
fine line.)
-R
Yep. Imcc should definitely move out off languages into its own subdir
under the top level (Not in the top level itself).
... Who should do this? I'd be willing to help if given direction.
Moving directories around in CVS is AFAIK a PITA. The last such
operation was done in the repository di
At Thu, 3 Jul 2003 18:16:45 -0400,
Clinton Pierce wrote:
> Parrot BASIC CGI
> http://www.camfriends.org/testform.html
> Let the fun begin. :)
Maybe it is time to play with mod_parrot again!
-R
s/Yet Another Society/The Perl Foundation/g
Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
All --
I noticed that there are many files with copyrights of
"when this is determined...", while some files have a
copyright of Yet Another Society. Seems like they should
all be Yet Another, or none should be...
> Sorry for a slightly off-topic post, but will Larry's State of the Onion
> be posted online soon?
Yes.
http://dev.perl.org/perl6/talks/
-R
> Really? I can't find anything about TPC7 in this page..
Sorry, had to take it down. It'll be back up in a few days.
At Fri, 18 Jul 2003 18:19:19 +0100,
Tony Bowden wrote:
> I've been chatting with Casey about how we should best be dealing with
> the perlbug RT interface - e.g. what to do when you come across a bug
> that's resolved, what the various statuses mean etc.
The proper place for this particular discus
> > I'd rather something that can actually live on bugs.perl.org.
> How about a bugs.perl.org Kwiki?
I have not yet drunk that particular Kool Aid.
I'm happy to accept patches. I also want to retain some level of
editorial control over it, to make sure we don't make right-turns.
-R
Please CC Mr.Sasada on any response.
(I've moved this ticket to the parrot queue.)
-R
=== Forwarded Message:
Date: 22 Jul 2003 08:47:22 -
Subject: [perl #23084] [The Parrot Primer] Japanese Translation
From: "K.Sasada via RT" <>
To: "AdminCc of perl Ticket #23084": ;
Hi. My name is Koic
> I also changed the other copyright notice at the start of
> disassemble.pl.
This thread made me wonder where any of this is documented.
A lot of projects have a "HACKING" file that explains "ground rules"
for contributing to the project -- all in one place. (Or at least it
references where th
> >> list has been about fighting Subversion. However, Arthur did post a mini
> >> status update at the end of July
> >> http://xrl.us/o2s -- Status report
> >
> > I am having trouble following this url. Is there another?
>
> Ah... bugger. I thought ponie-dev got gatewayed through to
> > The HLL doesn't know, how many ops one source line will need.
>
> Not *normally*, but if it's including code which is already literal
> assembler, it does: Imagine a version of lex/yacc wherein the the blocks
> of code you give are imcc or pasm (instead of C). Clearly, there's one
> op per li
> For that matter, won't the optomizer wreak havoc with other all of the
> various other uses of .setline?
One would hope.
> Anyway, how about this semantic: .setline_i would associate an
> ...
Before making up semantics, it might be useful to look at what other
systems do, like STABS and DWARF
> I guess mostly the syntax highlighting is the biggest concern. I
> use emacs and that does syntax highlighting for perl files. Is there any
> IDE out there that highlights POD differently than code? If that was the
> case then I probably wouldn't have a problem with in-module POD. I gue
> I sent a newer patch into bugs-parrot, but it doesn't seem to have
> made it around to this list. Should I
> a) be more patient (not a problem, this is a minor issue), or
> b) resubmit the patch? (to this list or to bugs-parrot?)
Only the _initial_ message sent to bugs-parrot gets sent to the l
> (In my opinion, the line-ending issue isn't a problem for Parrot in
> terms of this test--it's legitimate to expect that you can process a
> particular file, not matter what platform you happen to be on, and no
> matter if the file happens to have been created on another platform.)
Also, the pro
> I'd like to see:
...
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
> While I personally like the idea, I think it is unlikely given how
> much slower svn is on sizable repositories. Of course I have not
> tried it recently, so maybe that has changed...
> All that being said, I am in absolutely no position of authority about this...
This is, and always has been,
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
