chromatic writes: >I've submitted three bugs for Perl 6 to [EMAIL PROTECTED] They're in >RT, but they haven't been announced on this group. I believe Allison >has asked Ask to look into this.
Well, since I'm the RT owner, you and she should have asked me, or even better, the bugs6-admin at perl.org email address. Also, there is no bugs6 at perl.org email address as far as I can tell. >My plan is to funnel all Perl 6 test patches through the normal >process, so they may start showing up on this list. (If people >object, we can find something else.) The perl6 queue is not currently active in RT. Since development is primarilly happening on Parrot, things going into the parrot queue are forwarded to perl6-internals. The perl6 queue is just "there". It seems still to submit things for a project that doesn't have a complete spec yet. >I'd like to get some code review on these patches, but I don't want to hold >things up. If no one comments on them after a couple of days and if they seem >to work, I'll probably just check them in myself. >Everybody happy? I think we need a little bit of off-list discussion between the appropriate project management to come up with a scheme for this that prevents eggregious cross posting between mailing lists and keeps everyone happy and efficient. -R
