>On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 08:44:20AM -0700, Stephen Rawls wrote: >> The last two (well, the only two :) patches I sent >> were counted as spam. Some of the points were becuase
Sorry about that! I'm trying to be better safe than sorry in preventing spam from getting to the list. >> Do the patches still get read if they are counted as >> spam? Are they just less likely to be noticed? Yes. We periodically check the spam queue and move things to the right place. I have a todo list item for resending them to the list, but until that's done, they'll just be less noticed until someone goes through open tickets. >1: Changing your machine so that it doesn't think it's yahoo.com >2: Adding a Reply-To: back to your yahoo address > >(clearly if you currently need to have your machine think it's in a sub-domain >of yahoo.com so that your messages come From: yahoo.com, then you'd have to >do both of the above to get mail to go back to your yahoo account) He's using Yahoo webmail. >I'm curious why Reply-To is scored so highly - I don't set any Reply-To in >my messages, and I didn't think that it was normal practice. Ask the SpamAssassin folks. ;) I've dropped it's value down a little bit for the perlbug stuff. I may still need to drop it more. -R
