Re: problems sending patches

2002-08-03 Thread Robert Spier
>I don't like spam. Thanks for keeping it out. I try. :) >How do you recruit new "someone"s? I head down to the local mall and hold up a big sign. >Are they the same sort of "someone"s who manage perl5 bugs? Yup. (Or just anyone silly enough to volunteer.) >And (IIRC) Spam Assassin is th

Re: problems sending patches

2002-08-01 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 11:44:00PM -0700, Robert Spier wrote: > >On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 08:44:20AM -0700, Stephen Rawls wrote: > >> The last two (well, the only two :) patches I sent > >> were counted as spam. Some of the points were becuase > > Sorry about that! I'm trying to be better safe t

Re: problems sending patches

2002-07-31 Thread Robert Spier
>On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 08:44:20AM -0700, Stephen Rawls wrote: >> The last two (well, the only two :) patches I sent >> were counted as spam. Some of the points were becuase Sorry about that! I'm trying to be better safe than sorry in preventing spam from getting to the list. >> Do the patche

Re: problems sending patches

2002-07-24 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 08:44:20AM -0700, Stephen Rawls wrote: > The last two (well, the only two :) patches I sent > were counted as spam. Some of the points were becuase > I'm using Yahoo. Should I send patches from another > e-mail address? I have a NASA e-mail account, but I > can only acce

problems sending patches

2002-07-24 Thread Stephen Rawls
The last two (well, the only two :) patches I sent were counted as spam. Some of the points were becuase I'm using Yahoo. Should I send patches from another e-mail address? I have a NASA e-mail account, but I can only access it at work (they have external accounts, but they don't give them to a