On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 08:44:20AM -0700, Stephen Rawls wrote:
> The last two (well, the only two :) patches I sent
> were counted as spam.  Some of the points were becuase
> I'm using Yahoo.  Should I send patches from another
> e-mail address?  I have a NASA e-mail account, but I
> can only access it at work (they have external
> accounts, but they don't give them to all employees).
> 
> Do the patches still get read if they are counted as
> spam?  Are they just less likely to be noticed?
> 
> Stephen Rawls
> 
> PS.  Here's the spam asassain content analysis:
> 
>  -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results
> ------Content analysis details:   (7.3 hits, 7
> required)
> REPLY_TO_EMPTY     (4.3 points)  Reply-To: is empty
> FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS  (1.0 points)  From: ends in numbers
> FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD  (2.0 points)  Forged yahoo.com
> 'Received:' header found

Are you sending them from your home machine via SMTP with a mail program
that thinks your machine is part of yahoo.com? [Which you may need to do
to get your mail program to let you put a From: header in from yahoo.com]?

If so, can you tweak your mailer to work around the SpamAssassin rules
by either or both of

1: Changing your machine so that it doesn't think it's yahoo.com
2: Adding a Reply-To: back to your yahoo address

(clearly if you currently need to have your machine think it's in a sub-domain
of yahoo.com so that your messages come From: yahoo.com, then you'd have to
do both of the above to get mail to go back to your yahoo account)

I'm curious why Reply-To is scored so highly - I don't set any Reply-To in
my messages, and I didn't think that it was normal practice.

Nicholas Clark
-- 
Even better than the real thing:        http://nms-cgi.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to