Re: p6ge compiler's namespace...

2004-11-22 Thread Luke Palmer
Jerome Quelin writes: > On 04/11/22 07:14 -0700, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > > Looks great to me -- I'll switch things around to (pardon the pun) match. > > They'll become "P6GE::compile" (compiler sub) and "P6GE::Match", with > > a note that P6GE::compile is still subject to change. > > Well, sin

Re: p6ge compiler's namespace...

2004-11-22 Thread Luke Palmer
Patrick R. Michaud writes: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 07:14:11AM -0700, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:49:48AM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote: > > > It's likely that the p6ge_compile should be in P6GE, and that P6GEMatch > > > should be P6GE::Match (that is, [ "P6GE", "Match" ]).

Re: p6ge compiler's namespace...

2004-11-22 Thread Luke Palmer
William Coleda writes: > Should the compilation sub for p6g3 be in the root namespace as it is > currently, or moved to, say, a "p6ge" namespace? I doubt we should be taking up the users' precious namespace with things that aren't standardly prefixed. It's likely that the p6ge_compile should be

p6ge compiler's namespace...

2004-11-21 Thread William Coleda
Should the compilation sub for p6g3 be in the root namespace as it is currently, or moved to, say, a "p6ge" namespace?