William Coleda writes: > Should the compilation sub for p6g3 be in the root namespace as it is > currently, or moved to, say, a "p6ge" namespace?
I doubt we should be taking up the users' precious namespace with things that aren't standardly prefixed. It's likely that the p6ge_compile should be in P6GE, and that P6GEMatch should be P6GE::Match (that is, [ "P6GE", "Match" ]). Anyone disagree? Luke
